Journal of Science Policy & Governance
|
Volume 26, Issue 01 | June 16, 2025
|
White Paper
Precision Medicine and the Price of Equity
Kenna McRae1*, Josiah Yarbrough2*, Jonathan Judd3*
*All authors contributed equally Corresponding author: [email protected] |
Keywords: precision medicine, equity, public health, innovation, federal, disparities
Executive Summary
Medicine has increasingly moved toward more personalized approaches that utilize individual patient characteristics to tailor therapeutic interventions and predict outcomes. While advancements in precision medicine have garnered significant attention, the ways that this budding subset of technology intersects with existing health disparities are often overlooked. Precision medicine holds tremendous potential to transform healthcare, but it risks widening existing disparities if not managed inclusively. We highlight three core issues that further marginalize underserved communities: high costs, limited accessibility of precision medicine, and insufficient diversity in research that produces these innovations. We also propose opportunities for state and federal policymakers to mitigate these issues. Without deliberate policy interventions, these innovations may remain accessible only to privileged demographics, excluding underserved communities from life-saving treatments. Key policy recommendations include restructuring reimbursement frameworks, reducing drug prices, fostering diversity in clinical trials, and building strong community partnerships. These measures are essential to transforming precision medicine from a selective advantage to a universally accessible health benefit.
-Read the full article through download.-
Background header image courtesy of Harvard
Kenna McRae is a PhD student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Minnesota. She received her BS in Physics and BA in Global Health from Barrett, the Honors College at Arizona State University, as well as an MA in Bioethics and Science Policy from Duke University and an MS in Bioengineering from Stanford University. Her current work centers on applying data science methods to neuroengineering, and she is an officer for the University of Minnesota Graduate Women in Biomedical Engineering organization. She is interested in applying STEM, ethics, and science policy to health equity.
Josiah Yarbrough is an MD candidate at Stanford University School of Medicine and received his PhD from the Department of Chemical Engineering at Stanford University. As a Health Innovation Intern with Stanford's Mussallem Center for Biodesign, he researches policy initiatives for pediatric medical technologies. He also directs operations for the Stanford Asylum Collaborative, supporting medical care for asylum seekers, and leads longitudinal education projects for unhoused parents through LifeMoves in the San Francisco Bay Area. He is interested in developing innovative solutions to challenges in healthcare delivery.
Jonathan Judd is a PhD candidate in the Department of Genetics at Stanford University and received his BS in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering from Johns Hopkins University. His work researches the role of genetic factors and socioeconomic status on prostate cancer risk in order to inform public health interventions aimed at reducing health disparities. Jonathan is the president of the Stanford Science Policy Group, an organization aimed at engaging the Stanford community in science policy and advocacy across a multitude of policy issues.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Patrick Windham, Misha Angrist, and Arin Vansomphone for their valuable feedback on the paper throughout its development as well as the Stanford Science Policy Group for establishing an environment for the work to take place.
Disclaimer
The order in which the authors are listed does not represent the contribution of any individual author. All authors have contributed equally to this piece. Any views expressed in this article reflect those of the authors and should not be seen as official position statements by any of the affiliated institutions, departments or fellowship programs.
Josiah Yarbrough is an MD candidate at Stanford University School of Medicine and received his PhD from the Department of Chemical Engineering at Stanford University. As a Health Innovation Intern with Stanford's Mussallem Center for Biodesign, he researches policy initiatives for pediatric medical technologies. He also directs operations for the Stanford Asylum Collaborative, supporting medical care for asylum seekers, and leads longitudinal education projects for unhoused parents through LifeMoves in the San Francisco Bay Area. He is interested in developing innovative solutions to challenges in healthcare delivery.
Jonathan Judd is a PhD candidate in the Department of Genetics at Stanford University and received his BS in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering from Johns Hopkins University. His work researches the role of genetic factors and socioeconomic status on prostate cancer risk in order to inform public health interventions aimed at reducing health disparities. Jonathan is the president of the Stanford Science Policy Group, an organization aimed at engaging the Stanford community in science policy and advocacy across a multitude of policy issues.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Patrick Windham, Misha Angrist, and Arin Vansomphone for their valuable feedback on the paper throughout its development as well as the Stanford Science Policy Group for establishing an environment for the work to take place.
Disclaimer
The order in which the authors are listed does not represent the contribution of any individual author. All authors have contributed equally to this piece. Any views expressed in this article reflect those of the authors and should not be seen as official position statements by any of the affiliated institutions, departments or fellowship programs.
References
- Avolio, Marco, and Livio Trusolino. 2021. “Rational Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Reverse Tale of Men, Mice, and Culture Dishes.” Cancer Discovery 11 (7): 1644–60. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1531.
- Balls-Berry, Joyce E., and Edna Acosta-Pérez. 2017. “The Use of Community Engaged Research Principles to Improve Health: Community Academic Partnerships for Research.” Puerto Rico Health Sciences Journal 36 (2): 84–85. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC558294 4/.
- Bierer, Barbara E., Laura G. Meloney, Hayat R. Ahmed, and Sarah A . White. 2022. “Advancing the inclusion of underrepresented women in clinical research”. Cell Reports Medicine. 3 (4): 100553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100553.
- BioPharma Dive. 2019. “Drug Launch of the Year: Zolgensma.” Published December 9, 2019. https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/zolgensm a-novartis-drug-launch-dive-awards/566260/.
- Borrell, Brendan. 2025. “Drug Company to Share Revenues With Indigenous People Who Donated Their Genes.” The New York Times, January 7, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/07/health/va riant-bio-novo-nordisk-indigenous-revenue-sharing.html.
- California Legislative Information. 2023. “AB-425 Medi-Cal: pharmacogenomic testing.” October 9, 2023. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClie nt.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB425.
- Carballo, Rebecca, Emily Schmall, and Remy Tumin. 2024. “23andMe Breach Targeted Jewish and Chinese Customers, Lawsuit Says.” The New York Times, January 26, 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/26/business/ 23andme-hack-data.html.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2024. “Precision Health: Predict and Prevent Disease.” Accessed May 17, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/genomics-and-health/about/ precision-health-predict-and-prevent-disease.html.
- Choi, Gyeyoung, Gyeongseon Shin, and SeungJin Bae. 2022. “Price and Prejudice? The Value of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19 (19): 12366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912366.
- ColumbiaDoctors. 2016. “Spinal Muscular Atrophy / SMA (Pediatric).” Columbia. Published July 4, 2016. https://www.columbiadoctors.org/treatments-con ditions/spinal-muscular-atrophy-sma-pediatric.
- Eichler, Hans‐Georg, Mark Trusheim, Brigitte Schwarzer‐Daum, Kay Larholt, Markus Zeitlinger, Martin Brunninger, Michael Sherman, David Strutton, and Gigi Hirsch. 2022. “Precision Reimbursement for Precision Medicine: Using Real‐World Evidence to Evolve From Trial‐and‐Project to Track‐and‐Pay to Learn‐and‐Predict.” Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 111 (1): 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2471.
- ELSIhub. 2021. “All of Us Research Program Releases Tribal Consultation Final Report.” Published March 29, 2021. https://elsihub.org/news/all-us-research-program releases-tribal-consultation-final-report.
- Feldman, Robin. 2018. “May Your Drug Price Be Evergreen.” Journal of Law and the Biosciences 5 (3): 590–647. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy022.
- Feng, Kimberly, Massimiliano Russo, Luca Maini, Aaron S. Kesselheim, and Benjamin N. Rome. 2024. “Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs for Biologic Drugs After Biosimilar Competition.” JAMA Health Forum 5 (3): e235429. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.54 29.
- Fox, Kelsey. 2020. “The Illusion of Inclusion — The ‘All of Us’ Research Program and Indigenous Peoples’ DNA.” New England Journal of Medicine 383 (5): 411–413. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp19 15987.
- Garrison, Nanibaa’ A. 2013. “Genomic Justice for Native Americans: Impact of the Havasupai Case on Genetic Research.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 38 (2): 201–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912470009.
- Glasgow, Russell E., Bethany M. Kwan, and Daniel D. Matlock. 2018. “Realizing the Full Potential of Precision Health: The Need to Include Patient-Reported Health Behavior, Mental Health, Social Determinants, and Patient Preferences Data.” Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2 (3): 183–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.31.
- HealthPayerIntelligence. 2016. “Precision Medicine Is a ‘Whole New Ballgame for Insurers.’ ” Published February 5, 2016. https://healthpayerintelligence.com/news/precisi on-medicine-is-a-whole-new-ballgame-for-insurers .
- Hinton, Elizabeth, Elizabeth Williams, Jada Raphael, Anna Mudumala, Robin Rudowitz, Kathleen Gifford, Aimee Lashbrook, and Caprice Knapp. 2024. “Medicaid Budget Survey 2024-2025 - Executive Summary.” KFF (blog). October 23, 2024. https://www.kff.org/report-section/50-state-medic aid-budget-survey-fy-2024-2025-executive-summa ry/.
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Ethical and Legal Issues Relating to the Inclusion of Women in Clinical Studies, Anna C. Mastroianni, Ruth Faden, and Daniel Federman. 1994. “NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 Public Law 103-43.” Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies: Volume I. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK236531 /.
- Jefferson, Osmat A., W. Nicholson Price II, S. Sean Tu, Saurabh Vishnubhakat, and Arti K. Rai. 2025. “The puzzle of biologics manufacturing platform patents”. Nature Biotechnology. March 17, 2025. https://doi-org.stanford.idm.oclc.org/10.1038/s41 587-025-02579-y.
- Kaiser, Jocelyn. 2021. “Decades after a Tragic Failure, Gene Therapy Successfully Treats a Rare Liver Disease.” Science, May 18, 2021. https://www.science.org/content/article/decadesafter-tragic-failure-gene-therapy-successfully-treats -rare-liver-disease.
- Kesselheim, Aaron S., Jerry Avorn, and Ameet Sarpatwari. 2016. “The High Cost of Prescription Drugs in the United States: Origins and Prospects for Reform.” JAMA 316 (8): 858–71. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.11237.
- Kesselheim, Aaron S., Carolyn L. Treasure, and Steven Joffe. 2017. “Biomarker-Defined Subsets of Common Diseases: Policy and Economic Implications of Orphan Drug Act Coverage.” PLOS Medicine 14 (1): e1002190. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002190.
- Kolata, Gina. 2023. “F.D.A. Approves Sickle Cell Treatments, Including One That Uses CRISPR.” The New York Times, December 8, 2023. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/08/health/fd a-sickle-cell-crispr.html.
- Kolata, Gina, and Kenny Holston. 2024. “First Patient Begins Newly Approved Sickle Cell Gene Therapy.” The New York Times, May 6, 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/06/health/sic kle-cell-cure-first.html.
- Korngiebel, Diane M., Kenneth E. Thummel, and Wylie Burke. 2017. “Implementing Precision Medicine: The Ethical Challenges.” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 38 (1): 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2016.11.00.
- Lenartz, Andrea, Aaron M. Scherer, Wendy R. Uhlmann, Sonia M. Suter, Colleen Anderson Hartley, and Anya E.R. Prince. 2021. “The Persistent Lack of Knowledge and Misunderstanding of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) More than a Decade after Passage.” Genetics in Medicine : Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 23 (12): 2324–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-021-01268-w.
- Lander, Eric S., Françoise Baylis, Feng Zhang, Emmanuelle Charpentier, Paul Berg, Catherine Bourgain, Bärbel Friedrich, et al. 2019. “Adopt a Moratorium on Heritable Genome Editing.” Nature 567 (7747): 165–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00726-5.
- Manzo, Rosa D., Marisela Yepez, Brayan Preciado, and Laura Sainz Merin. 2023. “A Community-Driven Research Framework: Integrating Promotores as Co-Researchers.” Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 17 (4): 689–98. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2023.a914125
- Market Data Forecast. 2024. “North America Precision Medicine Market Report | 2024 to 2029.” Published July 1, 2024. https://www.marketdataforecast.com/market-repo rts/north-america-precision-medicine-market.
- Mast, Adam Feuerstein, Jason. 2024. “Patient Dies in Beam Therapeutics Trial of CRISPR Sickle Cell Treatment.” STAT (blog). November 5, 2024. https://www.statnews.com/2024/11/05/patient-d ies-sickle-cell-beam-therapeutics-crispr/.
- Molteni, Megan. 2018. “The NIH Launches Its Ambitious Million-Person Genetic Survey.” Wired. May 6, 2018. https://www.wired.com/story/all-of-us-launches/.
- Napolitano, Stefania, Giulia Martini, Davide Ciardiello, Sara Del Tufo, Erika Martinelli, Teresa Troiani, and Fortunato Ciardiello. 2024. “Targeting the EGFR Signalling Pathway in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.” The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology 9 (7): 664–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00479-X.
- National Cancer Institute. 2024. “Genetics of Colorectal Cancer (PDQ®).” Published June 21, 2024. https://www.cancer.gov/types/colorectal/hp/colo rectal-genetics-pdq.
- Native BioData Consortium. 2010. “About Us.”. Accessed February 12, 2025. https://nativebio.org/about-us/.
- Novartis. 2023. ”Novartis strengthens commitment to Beacon of Hope initiative, engages new collaborators to support clinical trial diversity, break down economic and education barriers.” July 12, 2023. https://www.novartis.com/us-en/news/media-rel eases/novartis-strengthens-commitment-beacon-h ope-initiative-engages-new-collaborators-support-c linical-trial-diversity-break-down-economic-and-e ducation-barriers.
- Obeidat Nour A., Francoise G Pradel, Irene H Zuckerman, James A Trovato, Francis B Palumbo, Sylvain DeLisle, C Daniel Mullins. 2010. “Racial/Ethnic and Age Disparities in Chemotherapy Selection for Colorectal Cancer”. The American Journal of Managed Care 16. no :515-22. https://www.ajmc.com/view/ajmc_10jul_obeidat_ 515to522.
- Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2023. “High Rates of Prior Authorization Denials by Some Plans and Limited State Oversight Raise Concerns About Access to Care in Medicaid Managed Care.” Published July 17, 2023. https://oig.hhs.gov/reports/all/2023/high-rates-of -prior-authorization-denials-by-some-plans-and-li mited-state-oversight-raise-concerns-about-access to-care-in-medicaid-managed-care/.
- Ojodu, Jelili, Mary M. Hulihan, Shammara N. Pope, Althea M. Grant. 2014. Incidence of Sickle Cell Trait — United States, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6349a3.htm?s_cid=mm6349a3_w.
- Philippidis, Alex. 2024. “Patient Dies in Beam Trial of SCD Candidate; Company Cites Conditioning.” GEN - Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News. November 6, 2024. https://www.genengnews.com/topics/genome-edit ing/patient-dies-in-beam-trial-of-scd-candidate-company-cites-conditioning/.
- Popejoy, Alice B., and Stephanie M. Fullerton. 2016. “Genomics Is Failing on Diversity.” Nature 538 (7624): 161–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/538161a.
- Reardon, Sara. 2023. “FDA Approves First CRISPR Gene Editing Treatment for Sickle Cell Disease.” Scientific American. December 8, 2023. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fda-approves-first-crispr-gene-editing-treatment-for-sick le-cell-disease/.
- Roberts, Thomas J., Aaron S. Kesselheim, and Jerry Avorn. 2023. “Variation in Use of Lung Cancer Targeted Therapies Across State Medicaid Programs, 2020-2021.” JAMA Network Open 6 (1): e2252562. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5 2562.
- Ruwitch, John. 2023. “His Baby Gene Editing Shocked Ethicists. Now He’s in the Lab Again.” NPR. June 8, 2023. https://www.npr.org/2023/06/08/1178695152/ch ina-scientist-he-jiankui-crispr-baby-gene-editing.
- Silverman, Ed. 2024. “CMS Will Use Outcomes-Based Agreements in Bid to Help Medicaid Pay for Sickle Cell Gene Therapies.” STAT (blog). January 30, 2024. https://www.statnews.com/pharmalot/2024/01/3 0/medicaid-sickle-vertex-bluebird-value-outcomes /.
- Tribble, Sarah Jane. 2017. “Drugs For Rare Diseases Have Become Uncommonly Rich Monopolies.” NPR. January 17, 2017. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/ 01/17/509506836/drugs-for-rare-diseases-have-be come-uncommonly-rich-monopolies.
- Tong, Michelle, Latoya Hill, and Samantha Artiga. 2022. “Racial Disparities in Cancer Outcomes, Screening, and Treatment.” KFF (blog). February 3, 2022. https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-polic y/issue-brief/racial-disparities-in-cancer-outcome s-screening-and-treatment/.
- Tyler, Sam. 2024. “‘All of Us’ program advances diversity, environmental health research”. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. October, 2024. https://factor.niehs.nih.gov/2024/10/feature/2-fea ture-all-of-us.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2016. “21st Century Cures Act.” Modified January 31, 2020. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/selec ted-amendments-fdc-act/21st-century-cures-act.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2024. “Diversity Action Plans to Improve Enrollment of Participants from Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Studies”. June, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/searc h-fda-guidance-documents/diversity-action-plans-i mprove-enrollment-participants-underrepresented populations-clinical-studies.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2023. “Precision Medicine.” August 18, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/in-vitro-dia gnostics/precision-medicine.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2023. “FDA Approves First Gene Therapies to Treat Patients with Sickle Cell Disease.” December 8, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announce ments/fda-approves-first-gene-therapies-treat-patie nts-sickle-cell-disease.
- Vokinger Kerstin N., Avorn Jerry, and Kesselheim Aaron S. 2023. “Sources of Innovation in Gene Therapies — Approaches to Achieving Affordable Prices.” New England Journal of Medicine 388 (4): 292–95. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2211729.
- Washington, Harriet A. 2006. Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present. Doubleday.
- Waymark. 2024. “New Study Shows Industry-Leading Performance for Waymark Signal.” December 5, 2024.
- https://www.waymarkcare.com/blog/new-study-p ublished-in-nature-scientific-reports-shows-indust ry-leading-performance-for-waymark-signal-in-pre dicting-avoidable-er-and-hospital-use.
- White House. 2025. “Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing”. January 20, 2025. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions /2025/01/ending-radical-and-wasteful-government -dei-programs-and-preferencing/.
DISCLAIMER: The findings and conclusions published herein are solely attributed to the author and not necessarily endorsed or adopted by the Journal of Science Policy and Governance. Articles are distributed in compliance with copyright and trademark agreements.
ISSN 2372-2193
ISSN 2372-2193