Journal of Science Policy & Governance
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • JSPG Anniversary Page
    • Staff
    • Ambassadors
    • Boards >
      • Advisory Board
      • Governing Board
      • Editorial Board
    • Careers >
      • Associate Editor
    • Partners
    • Sponsorships
    • Contact
  • Volumes
    • Volume 26 Issue 01
    • Volume 25 Issue 01
    • Volume 24 Issue 01
    • Sigma Xi and Rita Allen Foundation - Civic Science for Transformative Policy Solutions to Societal Challenges
    • Volume 23 Issue 01
    • APS Policy and Governance on Science, Technology and Global Security
    • IAI Development Policy and Global Change Science to Achieve the Vision of Sustainable Americas
    • Volume 22 Issue 01
    • GHFUTURES2030 Strengthening Youth-centered Policy and Governance of Digital Transformations in Health.
    • UNESCO AND MGCY OPEN SCIENCE POLICIES AS AN ACCELERATOR FOR ACHIEVING THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
    • Volume 21 Issue 01 >
      • Cover Memo: Volume 21, Issue 1, Summer Standard Issue
    • JSPG and UCL STEAPP Special Topics: Innovations in Science Diplomacy >
      • Cover Memo: Volume 20, Issue 3, Special Issue on Innovations in Science Diplomacy
    • Sigma XI-JSPG Special Issue: Re-envisioning STEM Education and Workforce Development for the 21st Century
    • Volume 20 Issue 01
    • JSPG Volume 19 Issue 01 (10 Years of Publishing)
    • Special Issue: 2021 NSPN-JSPG Policy Memo Competition
    • Special Issue: Shaping the Future of Science Policy
    • JSPG-UK SIN Special Issue: Climate Change Solutions
    • Volume 18 Issue 01
    • Special Issue: 2020 NSPN-JSPG Policy Memo Competition
    • Volume 17 Issue 01 (Supported by AAAS STPF)
    • JSPG-UN MGCY Special Issue: Impacts of Emerging Technologies
    • Volume 16 Issue 01
    • Volume 15 (Supported by CSPC)
    • Special Issue: 2019 NSPN-JSPG Policy Memo Competition
    • Volume 14
    • Volume 13
    • Volume 12
    • Volume 11
    • Volume 10
    • Volume 9
    • Volume 8
    • Volume 7
    • Volume 6
    • JSPG-UCS Special Issue: Healthy Food Policy
    • Volume 5
    • Volume 4
    • Special Issue: Hot Topics 2013
    • Volume 3
    • Volume 2
    • Volume 1
  • Submit to JSPG
    • Submission deadlines and guidelines
  • Announcements
    • News
    • Blog
  • Events
    • JSPG and NSPN 2024 Summer Standard Issue Events
    • Leadership chat series
  • Training
    • Writing
    • Resources
  • Media Mentions
  • Policy in action
  • Podcast
  • fabricated

The Resource-Draining Origins of Our AI
Assistants: Potential Policy Solutions to the
Unregulated Growth of Georgia’s Data Center
Industry

Journal of Science Policy & Governance
Volume 26, Issue 01 | June 16, 2025

Policy Memo
The Resource-Draining Origins of Our AI Assistants: Potential Policy Solutions to the Unregulated Growth of Georgia’s Data Center Industry

Mary Romano1, Katherine Logue1, Molly Tipping1, April McLane1, Richard Hunnewell1, Devanshi Kaura1, Rotem Kanny1
  1. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, US
​​
​Corresponding author:  [email protected] ​​​
DowNLOAD PDF
Keywords: Canada; open access; Diamond journals; research funding ​
https://doi.org/10.38126/JSPG260110 ​

Executive Summary

Data centers have been used for decades to store vital information and run complicated algorithms. They have become increasingly important for cloud storage and, more recently, the growth of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine-learning technologies. As the data center industry grows, its actual and potential environmental impacts should be monitored. Data centers consume vast amounts of water and power to function, sometimes harming the communities in which they operate. Currently, data center regulation is evolving rapidly. States across the U.S. are taking various approaches to mitigate the consequences of data center development. However, in the United States, companies are currently not required by the federal government to report power or water consumption. While larger data centers owned by tech giants tend to have high sustainability goals, the industry lags behind ideal sustainability levels of sustainability. There is ongoing debate as to whether data center development brings net economic good to the communities in which they operate when considering direct and indirect factors. Across the country, data center development is increasing, especially in Georgia and the Atlanta metro area. There are several reasons Georgia is an attractive location for data center development, including access to reliable power, a booming tech industry, and beneficial tax incentives. Given its position as an emerging data center hub, Georgia is well-placed to make strides in data center policy that addresses environmental and socioeconomic concerns. The Georgia government should introduce state-level regulations that create a data center study committee and a sustainability penalty policy. The study committee will enhance policymakers’ understanding of data center resource consumption and inform future policy. The sustainability penalty system will incentivize use of renewable energy to mitigate the effects of high energy consumption. This will foster a more sustainable data center industry that considers the environment, Georgia’s emissions goals, and the well-being of Georgia residents.

-Read the full article through download.-

DOWNLOAD PDF
<< previous article
Next Article >>

Background header image courtesy of georgiarecorder

Mary Romano is an undergraduate student at the Georgia Institute of Technology studying Public Policy. Mary specializes in Energy and Environment policy and Science and Technology policy. After graduation, Mary plans on pursuing a career in environmental policy. 
​

Katherine Logue is an undergraduate student at the Georgia Institute of Technology majoring in Computer Science and minoring in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. Her primary research interest is the intersection of computing and conservation, exploring how code can help address climate change. After graduating, Katherine plans to pursue a career in climate modeling. 

Molly Tipping is an undergraduate Public Policy major at the Georgia Institute of Technology. She is primarily interested in researching the intersections between social inequity (particularly in public health), climate change, and economic development. After graduation, Molly plans to obtain a J.D. and pursue a legal career in the realm of environmental policy and sustainable development. 

April McLane is an undergraduate student at the Georgia Institute of Technology majoring in Chemistry. She is primarily interested in how the chemical structures of materials can be used to advance renewable energy and sustainability. After graduation, April plans on pursuing a master’s in chemistry. 

Richard Hunnewell or RJ, is an undergraduate student at the Georgia Institute of Technology majoring in Nuclear and Radiological Engineering. He is primarily involved in research regarding nuclear power plant simulation, with secondary interests in robotics, namely perception and control in nuclear contexts. After graduation, RJ plans on pursuing a master’s in Nuclear Engineering. 

Devanshi Kaura is an undergraduate Materials Science and Engineering major at the Georgia Institute of Technology. While her interests span disciplines, she is most interested in renewable energy efficiency and sustainable product development as well as their intersection with policy. After graduation, Devanshi plans on pursuing a master's in public policy followed by a career in science and technology policy. 

Rotem Kanny is an undergraduate student at the Georgia Institute of Technology studying Public Policy. Rotem specializes in Energy and Environment Policy and Politics and Policy. After graduation, Rotem plans to pursue a master’s in sustainable energy and a career in environmental and energy policy, either in the government or corporate space. ​

References

  1. Avelar, Victor, Dan Azevedo, and Alan French. 2012. “PUE: A COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION OF THE METRIC.” The Green Grid. Vol. 49. the green grid. http://nikom.in/downloads/0a58778d-fc96-4482-8c46-13abe76b015c.pdf. 
  2. Bagby, Dyana. “Atlanta City Council Bans Data Centers Along BeltLine.” Georgia Public Broadcasting, September 4, 2024. https://www.gpb.org/news/2024/09/04/atlanta-ci ty-council-bans-data-centers-along-beltline#:~:text=Caption,rising%20demand%20from%20online% 20consumers. 
  3. Baird, Megan, PE. “3 Site Selection Considerations for Data Center Development.” Bohler, March 17, 2025. https://bohlerengineering.com/blog/insight/3-site -selection-considerations-for-data-center-development/. 
  4. Climate Action. “CO₂ Emission Performance Standards for Cars and Vans,” 2023 https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/transport/r oad-transport-reducing-co2-emissions-vehicles/co 2-emission-performance-standards-cars-and-vans_en#incentive-mechanism-for-zero--and-low-emissi on-vehicles-zlev. 
  5. DCD. “An Industry in Transition 1: Data Center Water Use,” November 29, 2021. https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/opinion s/an-industry-in-transition-1-data-center-water-use /. 
  6. Davis, J, D Bizo, A Lawrence, O Rogers, M Smolaks, L Simon, and D Donnellan. 2022. “Uptime Institute Global Data Center Survey 2022.” Uptime Institute. Uptime Institute. https://uptimeinstitute.com/uptime_assets/6768eca6a75d792c8eeede827d76de0d0380dee6b5ced20 fde45787dd3688bfe-2022-data-center-industry-sur vey-en.pdf?mkt_tok=NzExLVJJQS0xNDUAAAGOSSI Ohjw91Q9r0NfIJcneUNgFNuQhyPoThAXTyKpg4_T NKz6uaKsT3p3UMmlC-eauYPRXuqoNPls3w2UczD kkRz9zYgjazScSM2BmfuK9cw. 
  7. “Data Centers in Georgia | Georgia Department of Economic Development.” 2024. https://georgia.org/data-centers-georgia 
  8. “Data Transmission and Energy Efficient Internet Data Centers – American University Law Review,” 2017. https://aulawreview.org/blog/data-transmission-a nd-energy-efficient-internet-data-centers 
  9. “Delegated Regulation - EU - 2024/1364 - EN - EUR-Lex,” 2024. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2024/1364/ oj. 
  10. “EUR-Lex - 02019R0631-20231203 - EN - EUR-Lex.” 2024. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/? uri=CELEX%3A02019R0631-20231203 
  11. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. “Commissioner-Led Technical Conference This Fall on Co-Location of Large Loads at Generating Facilities,” 2023. https://www.ferc.gov/news-events/news/commissioner-led-technical-conference-fall-co-location-lar ge-loads-generating. 
  12. Federal Register. “Declaring a National Energy Emergency,” January 29, 2025. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/ 01/29/2025-02003/declaring-a-national-energy-emergency. 
  13. “Georgia Is a World Leader in FinTech | Georgia.org,” 2024. https://georgia.org/center-of-innovation/georgia-w orld-leader-fintech. 
  14. “Georgia Power. “Integrated Resource Plan,” n.d. https://www.georgiapower.com/about/company/f ilings/irp.html. 
  15. “Georgia PSC finalizes and approves Georgia Power’s 2023 IRP Update.” 2024. Georgia Power. April 16, 2024. https://www.georgiapower.com/news-hub/compa ny-news/georgia-public-service-commission-appr oves-2023-irp-update.html. 
  16. “Groups Urge Gov. Kemp to Sign Legislation Pausing Tax Breaks for Data Centers.” 2024. Environment Georgia. April 30, 2024. https://environmentamerica.org/georgia/media-ce nter/groups-urge-gov-kemp-to-sign-legislation-pau sing-tax-breaks-for-data-centers/. 
  17. Green, Alastair, Humayun Tai, Jesse Noffsinger, and Pankaj Sachdeva. “How Data Centers and the Energy Sector Can Sate AI&Rsquo;S Hunger for Power.” McKinsey & Company, September 17, 2024. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/private-capital/our-insights/how-data-centers-and-the-energ y-sector-can-sate-ais-hunger-for-power. 
  18. Green, Josh. “Downtown Data Center Seeks Permitting as City Approves Ban.” Urbanize Atlanta, September 5, 2024. https://atlanta.urbanize.city/post/downtown-data center-proposed-city-bans-them. 
  19. GovTech. “Atlanta City Council Bans Data Centers in Some Areas,” September 4, 2024. https://www.govtech.com/policy/atlanta-city-cou ncil-bans-data-centers-in-some-areas. 
  20. Hardee, B, A Hill, and T Shephard. 2022. “Tax Incentive Evaluation Georgia High-Tech Data Center Equipment Exemption.” The University of Georgia Carl Vinson Institute of Government. https://www.audits.ga.gov/ReportSearch/download/29072. 
  21. Hansen, Zachary. “7-building Data Center Campus Proposed in Metro Atlanta.” Ajc, May 2, 2024. https://www.ajc.com/news/business/23-million-s quare-foot-data-center-campus-proposed-west-of-a tlanta/7FQEETMNLJAEJNTNQEAPOHBRRY/#:~:tex t=Since%202023%2C%20data%20center%20cons truction%20in%20metro,data%20from%20real% 20estate%20services%20firm%20CBRE. 
  22. Hansen, Z. “Atlanta Banned Data Centers Near Beltline, MARTA. Some Will Move Forward.” Ajc, September 5, 2024. https://www.ajc.com/news/business/some-data-c enters-plans-proceed-despite-ban-near-transit-beltline/QYEDBS6FMVBBPK3YNGADNL3TJA/. 
  23. Hansen, Z, and D Kann. 2024. “Why Is Georgia Attracting so Many New Data Centers?” GovTech. October 7, 2024. https://www.govtech.com/analytics/why-is-georgi a-attracting-so-many-new-data-centers. 
  24. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. “Chairs Rodgers and Duncan Request Details on How FERC Is Addressing Electricity Demand Growth, Particularly From Data Centers,” July 12, 2024. https://energycommerce.house.gov/posts/chairs-r odgers-and-duncan-request-details-on-how-ferc-isaddressing-electricity-demand-growth-particularly from-data-centers. 
  25. John Lenio, Economist and Managing Director, Economic Incentives Group (EIG), CBRE and John Lenio, Economist and Managing Director, Economic Incentives Group (EIG), CBRE. “The Mystery Impact of Data Centers on Local Economies Revealed - Area Development.” Area Development, February 12, 2015. https://www.areadevelopment.com/data-centers/Data-Centers-Q1-2015/impact-of-data-center-devel opment-locally-2262766.shtml. 
  26. Kelley, T., Coomer, C., Shaw, J., and Stephens, R. 2018. “House Bill 696.” Ga.gov. https://www.legis.ga.gov/api/legislation/documen t/20172018/175300 
  27. Lenio, J. “The Mystery Impact of Data Centers on Local Economies Revealed - Area Development.” Area Development, February 12, 2015. https://www.areadevelopment.com/data-centers/Data-Centers-Q1-2015/impact-of-data-center-devel opment-locally-2262766.shtml. 
  28. Miller, Rich. 2023. “Atlanta Prepares for Data Center Building Boom Amid Growing Interest from Hyperscale Users.” Data Center Frontier. September 13, 2023. https://www.datacenterfrontier.com/site-selection /article/33011438/atlanta-prepares-for-data-center -building-boom-amid-growing-interest-from-hyperscale-users. 
  29. Molyneux, Cándido García. “New Sustainability Reporting Requirements for Data Centers in the EU | Inside Energy &Amp; Environment.” Inside Energy & Environment, August 19, 2024. https://www.insideenergyandenvironment.com/2024/08/new-sustainability-reporting-requirements -for-data-centers-in-the-eu/. 
  30. Md Abu Bakar Siddik, Arman Shehabi, and Landon Marston. “The Environmental Footprint of Data Centers in the United States.” Environmental Research Letters 16, no. 6 (April 27, 2021): 064017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfba1. 
  31. Norred, Codi. “Georgia Power Customers Will Pay Billions to Burn Dirty Wood.” Ajc, October 1, 2024. https://www.ajc.com/opinion/opinion-georgia-po wer-customers-will-pay-billions-to-burn-dirty-woo d/TFC7PNEGP5A57H5F7JAEMDTQH4/. 
  32. Pham, Nam. 2017. “Data Centers: Jobs and Opportunities in Communities Nationwide.” SSRN Electronic Journal, January. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2998644. 
  33. Pillsbury Law. “AI And Data Centers in a Time of Legal and Technological Disruption,” January 30, 2025. https://www.pillsburylaw.com/en/news-and-insig hts/ai-data-centers-trump.html. 
  34. Procore. “LEED Certification: Understanding the Process & Limitations | Procore,” March 21, 2025. https://www.procore.com/library/leed-certificatio n-construction#challenges-and-criticisms-of-leed-c ertification. 
  35. PwC. 2023. “Economic, Environmental, and Social Impacts of Data Centers in the United States: Including Statewide Impacts for Arizona, Ohio, and Virginia.” Data Center Coalition. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/63a4849ea b1c756a1d3e97b1/t/65048f92e74c956b68a419e4 /1694797719030/Data+Center+Impact+Study+Executive+Summary.pdf. 
  36. Shehabi, Arman, Sarah Smith, Dale Sartor, Richard Brown, Magnus Herrlin, Jonathan Koomey, Eric Masanet, Nathaniel Horner, Inês Azevedo, and William Lintner. 2016. “United States Data Center Energy Usage Report.” https://doi.org/10.2172/1372902. 
  37. Utility Dive. “How Data Centers Are Being Used to Bypass Clean Energy Goals,” August 8, 2024. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/data-centers-b ypass-clean-energy-gas-fossil-fuels-nuclear-load-gr owth/720562/. 
  38. Wheatley, Thomas. 2024. “Atlanta Approves Data Center Ban Near Beltline and MARTA Stations.” Axios Atlanta. September 5, 2024. https://www.axios.com/local/atlanta/2024/09/05 /atlanta-data-center-ban-beltline-central-businessdistrict. 
  39. Zachary Hansen and Drew Kann. “Georgia Welcomed Data Centers. Now It Needs More Power.” Governing, May 2, 2024. https://www.governing.com/infrastructure/georgia-welcomed-data-centers-now-it-needs-more-powe r. 
  40. Zorn, D, A Magnum, and M Arel. 2021. “The Impact of Data Centers on the Georgia Economy.” Magnum Economics. https://silkstart.s3.amazonaws.com/00f29455-4a7 9-4fb8-a5e9-a358fd912a8c.pdf.

DISCLAIMER: The findings and conclusions published herein are solely attributed to the author and not necessarily endorsed or adopted by the Journal of Science Policy and Governance. Articles are distributed in compliance with copyright and trademark agreements.

ISSN 2372-2193
Picture
© 2022 Journal of Science Policy & Governance, Inc. All rights reserved. The opinions, findings and conclusions from JSPG publications, additional article commentaries and related events do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal.
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • JSPG Anniversary Page
    • Staff
    • Ambassadors
    • Boards >
      • Advisory Board
      • Governing Board
      • Editorial Board
    • Careers >
      • Associate Editor
    • Partners
    • Sponsorships
    • Contact
  • Volumes
    • Volume 26 Issue 01
    • Volume 25 Issue 01
    • Volume 24 Issue 01
    • Sigma Xi and Rita Allen Foundation - Civic Science for Transformative Policy Solutions to Societal Challenges
    • Volume 23 Issue 01
    • APS Policy and Governance on Science, Technology and Global Security
    • IAI Development Policy and Global Change Science to Achieve the Vision of Sustainable Americas
    • Volume 22 Issue 01
    • GHFUTURES2030 Strengthening Youth-centered Policy and Governance of Digital Transformations in Health.
    • UNESCO AND MGCY OPEN SCIENCE POLICIES AS AN ACCELERATOR FOR ACHIEVING THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
    • Volume 21 Issue 01 >
      • Cover Memo: Volume 21, Issue 1, Summer Standard Issue
    • JSPG and UCL STEAPP Special Topics: Innovations in Science Diplomacy >
      • Cover Memo: Volume 20, Issue 3, Special Issue on Innovations in Science Diplomacy
    • Sigma XI-JSPG Special Issue: Re-envisioning STEM Education and Workforce Development for the 21st Century
    • Volume 20 Issue 01
    • JSPG Volume 19 Issue 01 (10 Years of Publishing)
    • Special Issue: 2021 NSPN-JSPG Policy Memo Competition
    • Special Issue: Shaping the Future of Science Policy
    • JSPG-UK SIN Special Issue: Climate Change Solutions
    • Volume 18 Issue 01
    • Special Issue: 2020 NSPN-JSPG Policy Memo Competition
    • Volume 17 Issue 01 (Supported by AAAS STPF)
    • JSPG-UN MGCY Special Issue: Impacts of Emerging Technologies
    • Volume 16 Issue 01
    • Volume 15 (Supported by CSPC)
    • Special Issue: 2019 NSPN-JSPG Policy Memo Competition
    • Volume 14
    • Volume 13
    • Volume 12
    • Volume 11
    • Volume 10
    • Volume 9
    • Volume 8
    • Volume 7
    • Volume 6
    • JSPG-UCS Special Issue: Healthy Food Policy
    • Volume 5
    • Volume 4
    • Special Issue: Hot Topics 2013
    • Volume 3
    • Volume 2
    • Volume 1
  • Submit to JSPG
    • Submission deadlines and guidelines
  • Announcements
    • News
    • Blog
  • Events
    • JSPG and NSPN 2024 Summer Standard Issue Events
    • Leadership chat series
  • Training
    • Writing
    • Resources
  • Media Mentions
  • Policy in action
  • Podcast
  • fabricated