Photo by Min An from Pexels
Journal of Science Policy & Governance | Volume 18, Issue 02 | June 21, 2021

Policy Memo: An Approach to Scientific and Legislative Governance of Solar Radiation Modification Research in the United States

Neva Luthria (1), Steven L. Farrell (2), Ingrid Joylyn Paredes (2)
  1. New York University, Gallatin School of Individualized Study, New York, NY
  2. New York University, Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY

Corresponding author: nevaluthria@nyu.edu
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.38126/JSPG180207
Keywords: climate change; geoengineering; solar radiation management; IPCC; UN; COP26
Executive Summary: The climate crisis requires immediate, rapid, and responsible action across all sectors. Without implementation of aggressive mitigation strategies, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has warned that we will fail to remain below the catastrophic global warming threshold of 1.5°C. Climate engineering technologies, such as carbon dioxide removal and solar radiation modification (SRM), have been proposed as mitigation strategies, but have not been deployed at scale. In addition to the scaling problems, SRM technologies, particularly stratospheric aerosol injection, have faced criticism over ethical implications of their implementation. The United Nations (UN) efforts to introduce international governance over SRM have been blocked by several countries, including the United States (US). Meanwhile, domestic researchers in the US have independently pursued small-scale experiments. The effects of these experiments remain uncertain, yet, if scaled, extend to non-consenting countries, including those already more susceptible to the climate crisis. We recommend that the US (1) stop blocking the UN from pursuing research into the impacts of SRM to allow for equitable governance options to be explored and (2) establish a national advisory committee on solar geoengineering.

-Read the full article through download.-
Download PDF

References

  1. “Advisory Committee Members.” 2020. SCoPEx Advisory Committee, December 15, 2020. https://scopexac.com/advisory-committee-members/.
  2. Carbon Engineering. 2020/ “FAQs about Our Carbon Removal Technology.” Accessed December 20, 2020. https://carbonengineering.com/frequently-asked-questions/.
  3. Chemnick, Jean. 2019. “U.S. Blocks U.N. Resolution on Geoengineering.” Scientific American, March 15, 2019. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/u-s-blocks-u-n-resolution-on-geoengineering/.
  4. Climeworks. 2020. “Why Remove CO2 via Direct Air Capture? FAQs, Scientific Papers and Policy Reports.” Accessed December 20, 2020. https://www.climeworks.com/faq-about-direct-air-capture.
  5. de Coninck, H., A. Revi, M. Babiker, P. Bertoldi, M. Buckeridge, A. Cartwright, W. Dong, J. Ford, S. Fuss, J.-C. Hourcade, D. Ley, R. Mechler, P. Newman, A. Revokatova, S. Schultz, L. Steg, and T. Sugiyama, 2018: Strengthening and Implementing the Global Response. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.
  6. Deputy Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs to Secretary of State Rusk. 1967. Weather Modification in North Vietnam and Laos (Project Popeye), Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968, Volume XXVIII, Laos, Document 274. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1964-68v28/d274.
  7. Eckstein, David, Vera Künzel, and Laura Schäfer. 2019. Issue brief. Global Climate Risk Index 2020. Berlin: Germanwatch e.V..
  8. “Frequently Asked Questions.” 2020/ U.S. Energy Information Administration. Accessed December 21, 2020. https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=709&t=6.
  9. Frumhoff, Peter C., and Jennie C. Stephens. 2018. “Towards Legitimacy of the Solar Geoengineering Research Enterprise.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 376, no. 2119. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0459.
  10. “Global Effects of Mount Pinatubo.” 2011. NASA Langley Research Center Aerosol Research Branch, June 15, 2011. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/1510/global-effects-of-mount-pinatubo.
  11. H.R. 1158. 116th Cong. 2019. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1158.
  12. IPCC,.2018: Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 32.
  13. “Plan for Climate Change and Environmental Justice.” 2020. Joe Biden for President: Official Campaign Website, October 29, 2020. https://joebiden.com/climate-plan/.
  14. “Rep. McNerney Introduces Legislation to Authorize Atmospheric Climate Intervention Research.” 2019. Congressman Jerry McNerney, December 19, 2019. https://mcnerney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-mcnerney-introduces-legislation-to-authorize-atmospheric-climate.
  15. Reynolds, Jesse L. 2019. “Solar Geoengineering to Reduce Climate Change: A Review of Governance Proposals.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A 475, no. 2229. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0255.
  16. Rogelj, J., D. Shindell, K. Jiang, S. Fifita, P. Forster, V. Ginzburg, C. Handa, H. Kheshgi, S. Kobayashi, E. Kriegler, L. Mundaca, R. Séférian, and M.V. Vilariño, 2018: Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Development. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.
  17. Smith, Matthew. 2019. “Most People Expect to Feel the Effects of Climate Change, and Many Think It Will Make Us Extinct,” September 13, 2019. https://today.yougov.com/topics/science/articles-reports/2019/09/16/global-climate-change-poll.
Neva Luthria is a senior at New York University's Gallatin School of Individualized Study. Her academic concentration studies the intersection of physics, chemistry, and strategy. At the Hybrid Nanomaterials Laboratory within NYU's Tandon School of Engineering, she conducts research on nanoparticle thin films for the electrocatalysis of carbon dioxide to alcohol fuels.
 
Steven L. Farrell received his B.S and M.S. in Chemical Engineering from Drexel University, and is pursuing a Ph.D. in Materials Chemistry at the New York University Tandon School of Engineering as a member of the Hybrid Nanomaterials Laboratory. He studies two-dimensional nanostructures and materials for sustainable catalysis applications and previously was a coordinator of NYU’s Science Policy and Diplomacy course. Additionally, he has coordinated the #StreamForScience digital event collaboration with March for Science NYC.
 
Ingrid Joylyn Paredes is a Ph.D. candidate in chemical engineering at the New York University Tandon School of Engineering in Brooklyn, NY as a member of the Hybrid Nanomaterials Laboratory. The focus of her thesis research is the development of novel nanomaterial systems for clean energy technologies. She currently serves as co-chair of March for Science NYC.
DISCLAIMER: The findings and conclusions published herein are solely attributed to the author and not necessarily endorsed or adopted by the Journal of Science Policy and Governance or issue partners/sponsors. Articles are distributed in compliance with copyright and trademark agreements.

ISSN 2372-2193
© 2022 Journal of Science Policy & Governance, Inc. All rights reserved. The opinions, findings and conclusions from JSPG publications and events do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal.