Journal of Science Policy & Governance
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • JSPG Anniversary Page
    • Staff
    • Ambassadors
    • Boards >
      • Advisory Board
      • Governing Board
      • Editorial Board
    • Careers >
      • Associate Editor
    • Partners
    • Sponsorships
    • Contact
  • Volumes
    • Volume 25 Issue 01
    • Volume 24 Issue 01
    • Sigma Xi and Rita Allen Foundation - Civic Science for Transformative Policy Solutions to Societal Challenges
    • Volume 23 Issue 01
    • APS Policy and Governance on Science, Technology and Global Security
    • IAI Development Policy and Global Change Science to Achieve the Vision of Sustainable Americas
    • Volume 22 Issue 01
    • GHFUTURES2030 Strengthening Youth-centered Policy and Governance of Digital Transformations in Health.
    • UNESCO AND MGCY OPEN SCIENCE POLICIES AS AN ACCELERATOR FOR ACHIEVING THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
    • Volume 21 Issue 01 >
      • Cover Memo: Volume 21, Issue 1, Summer Standard Issue
    • JSPG and UCL STEAPP Special Topics: Innovations in Science Diplomacy >
      • Cover Memo: Volume 20, Issue 3, Special Issue on Innovations in Science Diplomacy
    • Sigma XI-JSPG Special Issue: Re-envisioning STEM Education and Workforce Development for the 21st Century
    • Volume 20 Issue 01
    • JSPG Volume 19 Issue 01 (10 Years of Publishing)
    • Special Issue: 2021 NSPN-JSPG Policy Memo Competition
    • Special Issue: Shaping the Future of Science Policy
    • JSPG-UK SIN Special Issue: Climate Change Solutions
    • Volume 18 Issue 01
    • Special Issue: 2020 NSPN-JSPG Policy Memo Competition
    • Volume 17 Issue 01 (Supported by AAAS STPF)
    • JSPG-UN MGCY Special Issue: Impacts of Emerging Technologies
    • Volume 16 Issue 01
    • Volume 15 (Supported by CSPC)
    • Special Issue: 2019 NSPN-JSPG Policy Memo Competition
    • Volume 14
    • Volume 13
    • Volume 12
    • Volume 11
    • Volume 10
    • Volume 9
    • Volume 8
    • Volume 7
    • Volume 6
    • JSPG-UCS Special Issue: Healthy Food Policy
    • Volume 5
    • Volume 4
    • Special Issue: Hot Topics 2013
    • Volume 3
    • Volume 2
    • Volume 1
  • Submit to JSPG
    • Submission deadlines and guidelines
  • Announcements
    • News
    • Blog
  • Events
    • JSPG and NSPN 2024 Summer Standard Issue Events
    • Leadership chat series
  • Training
    • Writing
    • Resources
  • Media Mentions
  • Policy in action
  • Podcast
  • fabricated

Best Practices for an Equitable Clean Energy Transition: A Toolkit for U.S. States

Photo by Kelly Lacy from Pexels
Journal of Science Policy & Governance | Volume 18, Issue 02 | June 21, 2021

Policy Memo: Best Practices for an Equitable Clean Energy Transition: A Toolkit for U.S. States

Sindhu S. Nathan (1), Kavitha Chintam (2), Brooks Clingman (3), Alexandra Johnson (4)

  1. Stanford University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford, CA
  2. Northwestern University, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Evanston, IL
  3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cambridge, MA
  4. University of California, Berkeley, Department of Public Health, Berkeley, CA

​Corresponding author: [email protected]
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.38126/JSPG180208
Keywords: clean energy; energy equity; U.S. state policies; climate change

Executive Summary: The clean energy transition is underway, providing valuable insights for governments introducing clean energy policies. However, not all policies are equal, and some communities are excluded from the benefits of the energy transition without policies that explicitly involve them. These excluded people are members of environmental justice communities, people from low-income communities, and others who have been historically discriminated against. We propose a “clean energy equity toolkit” to promote an equitable transition for U.S. state governments presented to the leadership of the National Governors Association, where state governments share best practices. This toolkit identifies policies that help more people reap lower electricity costs, gain access to clean energy jobs, and realize other benefits like improved air quality. We recommend three policies: (1) establish a Clean Energy Equity Office, (2) develop a Clean Energy Career Advancement Program, and (3) implement a minimum resource investment requirement for clean energy projects benefiting disadvantaged communities. Though this toolkit is directed to U.S. state governments, the policies can be adapted by other interested parties and states, domestic and international.

-Read the full article through download.-

Download PDF

References

  1. S 851, Virginia Clean Economy Act, Chapter 1194, (VA 2020).
  2. SB 5116, Supporting Washington's clean energy economy and transitioning to a clean, affordable, and reliable energy future, (WA 2019-2020). https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=5116&Initiative=false&Year=2019.
  3. S. 6599, Article 75-0117, Climate Change: Investment of Funds, NY State Assembly, (NY 2019). https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2019/s6599.
  4. Ayub, Parwana and Sona Mohnot, Building a Diverse, Equitable, and Inclusive Cleantech Industry. The Greenlining Institute, 2020. https://greenlining.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Greenlining-Building-Diverserse-Equitable-Inclusive-CleanTech-Industry-Report-2020.pdf.
  5. Berube, Alan, Three things that matter for upward mobility in the labor market. The Brookings Institution, 2019. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2019/01/15/three-things-that-matter-for-upward-mobility-in-the-labor-market/.
  6. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). 2019. “Decision Establishing a Self-Generation Incentive Program Equity Resiliency Budget, Modifying Existing Equity Budget Incentives, Approving Carry-Over of Accumulated Unspent Funds, and Approving $10 Million to Support the San Joaquin Valley Disadvantaged Community Pilot Programs.”
  7. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). n.d.a “Disadvantaged Communities.” Accessed November 20, 2020. https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/discom/.
  8. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). n.d.b “Self-Generation Incentive Program.” Accessed November 20, 2020. https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/sgip/.
  9. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). 2021. “Clean Energy Financing Workshop for R.20-08-022” Accessed February 28, 2020. http://www.adminmonitor.com/ca/cpuc/workshop/20210128/.
  10. Carley, Sanya and David M Konisky. 2020. “The Justice and Equity Implications of the Clean Energy Transition” Nature Energy 5 (June): 569-577 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0641-6.
  11. Doughman, Pamela, Electric Program Investment Charge 2019 Annual Report. 2020. https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/2020publications/CEC-500-2020-009/CEC-500-2020-009-CMF.pdf.
  12. ENERGY STAR. 2012. “Building Performance with ENERGY STAR Program Framework ,” January 2012. https://www.energystar.gov/sites/default/files/asset/document/BPwES_Program_Framework_Website.pdf.
  13. Eng, Tiffany et al. CalEnviroScreen: A Critical Tool for Achieving Environmental Justice in California. California Environmental Justice Alliance, 2018. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180AB523.
  14. Environmental Protection Agency. “Chumash Community Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Project.” June 2016. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-06/documents/chumash_community_energy_efficiency_and_renewable_energy_project_profile_.pdf.
  15. Environmental Protection Agency. “Environmental Justice.” 2016. https://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice.
  16. European Commission, Commission Recommendation of 14.10.2020 on energy poverty, Kadri Simson. Brussels, Belgium: 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/recommendation_on_energy_poverty_c2020_9600.pdf.
  17. Foster, David. Rep. 2020 U.S. Energy & Employment Report. National Association of State Energy Officials and Energy Futures Initiative, n.d. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5a98cf80ec4eb7c5cd928c61/t/5ee78423c6fcc20e01b83896/1592230956175/USEER+2020+0615.pdf.
  18. Graff, Michelle, and Maureen Pirog. "Red tape is not so hot: Asset tests impact participation in the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program." Energy Policy 129 (2019): 749-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.042.
  19. Griffith, Alden B., Monica R. Higgins, and James Morton Turner. 2014. "A rooftop revolution? A multidisciplinary analysis of state-level residential solar programs in New Jersey and Massachusetts." Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4, no. 2 (2014): 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-013-0156-6
  20. Kann, Shayle, and Attila Toth. “How Wealthy Are Residential Solar Customers?” 2017. gtmresearch .
  21. Kupšys, Kęstutis. 2020. “Policy Recommendations for the Implementation of the Clean Energy for all Europeans Package” Solutions to Tackle Energy Poverty: STEP Project.. https://www.stepenergy.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Policy_Recommendations_1st_set_D6.3_final.pdf.
  22. Langer, Gary. 2018. “Public Backs Action on Global Warming –but with Cost Concerns and Muted Urgency.” ABC News/Stanford/Resources for the Future Poll: Public Attitudes on Global Warming. Langer Research Associates. https://www.langerresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/1198a1Global-Warming.pdf.
  23. Lukanov, Boris R., and Elena M. Krieger. 2019. "Distributed solar and environmental justice: Exploring the demographic and socio-economic trends of residential PV adoption in California." Energy Policy 134 (2019): 110935 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110935
  24. Luke, Nikki, Carol Zabin, Dalia Velasco, and Robert Collier. Rep. Diversity in California’s Clean Energy Workforce: Access to Jobs for Disadvantaged Workers in Renewable Energy Construction, August 2017.
  25. Mullendore, Seth. 2019. “Energy Storage Is Failing to Reach Those Most in Need: Policy Can Help.” Renewable Energy World, November 22, 2019. https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/2019/11/22/energy-storage-is-failing-to-reach-those-most-in-need-policy-can-help/.
  26. New Jersey Legislature. Senate. No. 2484. 219th Legislature., Introduced in Senate May 14, 2020. https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2020/Bills/S2500/2484_I1.PDF.
  27. Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences. n.d. “Why Community Engagement Matters.” Plone site. Accessed December 15, 2020. https://aese.psu.edu/research/centers/cecd/engagement-toolbox/engagement/why-community-engagement-matters.
  28. Senate No. 2484, 219th Legislature, Office of Clean Energy Equity, (NJ 2020). https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2020/Bills/S2500/2484_I1.PDF
  29. Shelly-Maloney Apprentice Labor Standards act of 1939, California Labor Code Sections 3070-3099.5 (2005), Chapter 4. Apprenticeship. https://law.justia.com/codes/california/2005/lab/3070-3099.5.html
  30. Sunter, Deborah A., Sergio Castellanos, and Daniel M. Kammen. 2019. "Disparities in rooftop photovoltaics deployment in the United States by race and ethnicity." Nature Sustainability 2, no. 1 (2019): 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0204-z
  31. Vachon, Todd E. 2019. "The Green Transition: Renewable Energy Technology, Climate Change Mitigation, and the Future of Work in New Jersey."
  32. Zhai, Panmao, Hans-Otto Pörtner, Debra Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, Anna Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, and S. Connors. 2018. “Global Warming of 1.5 OC: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5° C Above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty.

Sindhu Nathan is a PhD candidate in chemical engineering at Stanford University. She researches catalyst materials used for converting syngas (carbon monoxide and hydrogen) to value-added products such as ethanol or other chemical feedstocks. In addition to her research, she is a former Shultz Fellow at the California Energy Commission in the Office of Commissioner Patty Monahan. She is also the Vice-President of the Stanford Science Policy Group, Vice-Chair of Communications at the National Science Policy Network, and an active member of the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee in the same organization.
 
Kavitha Chintam is a PhD student studying chemical engineering at Northwestern University. Her research focuses on co-electroreduction of carbon dioxide with additives and the process’s underlying mechanisms. Kavitha is the Legislative Outreach Chair for Northwestern’s Science Policy Outreach Taskforce (SPOT) and heads the Science One-Pager Initiative. She is also an active member of her department’s anti-racism, diversity, equity, and inclusion committee. Outside of Northwestern, she is a volunteer with refugee organizations in Chicago and environmental justice groups in the Midwestern U.S. She is a member of the National Science Policy Network.
 
Brooks Clingman is a graduate student studying Materials Science and Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His research focuses on overcoming barriers to manufacturing scalability for lithium-ion batteries and future battery chemistries. Brooks is keenly interested in energy technology and the clean energy transition, and he aims to facilitate technology transfer of promising early-stage energy technologies throughout his career. Prior to graduate school, Brooks worked in the private sector for an aerospace and defense contractor. He is a member of the National Science Policy Network.
 
Alexandra Johnson is a Master of Public Health student at the University of California, Berkeley and a research associate at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. Her research focuses on indoor air quality. Alexandra has multiple years of experience working with groups at the volunteer level lobbying for clean energy and environmental health, and previously worked as an environmental engineer in both the public and private sectors after obtaining her undergraduate degree in chemical engineering. She is currently a member of the National Science Policy Network and works with various environmental justice groups in California, with a focus on policy.
 
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the members of the National Science Policy Network for their edits and feedback during the development of the memo.
 
Disclaimer
Authors’ views do not necessarily reflect those of their respective departments or institutions.

DISCLAIMER: The findings and conclusions published herein are solely attributed to the author and not necessarily endorsed or adopted by the Journal of Science Policy and Governance or issue partners/sponsors. Articles are distributed in compliance with copyright and trademark agreements.

ISSN 2372-2193
Picture
© 2022 Journal of Science Policy & Governance, Inc. All rights reserved. The opinions, findings and conclusions from JSPG publications, additional article commentaries and related events do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal.
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • JSPG Anniversary Page
    • Staff
    • Ambassadors
    • Boards >
      • Advisory Board
      • Governing Board
      • Editorial Board
    • Careers >
      • Associate Editor
    • Partners
    • Sponsorships
    • Contact
  • Volumes
    • Volume 25 Issue 01
    • Volume 24 Issue 01
    • Sigma Xi and Rita Allen Foundation - Civic Science for Transformative Policy Solutions to Societal Challenges
    • Volume 23 Issue 01
    • APS Policy and Governance on Science, Technology and Global Security
    • IAI Development Policy and Global Change Science to Achieve the Vision of Sustainable Americas
    • Volume 22 Issue 01
    • GHFUTURES2030 Strengthening Youth-centered Policy and Governance of Digital Transformations in Health.
    • UNESCO AND MGCY OPEN SCIENCE POLICIES AS AN ACCELERATOR FOR ACHIEVING THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
    • Volume 21 Issue 01 >
      • Cover Memo: Volume 21, Issue 1, Summer Standard Issue
    • JSPG and UCL STEAPP Special Topics: Innovations in Science Diplomacy >
      • Cover Memo: Volume 20, Issue 3, Special Issue on Innovations in Science Diplomacy
    • Sigma XI-JSPG Special Issue: Re-envisioning STEM Education and Workforce Development for the 21st Century
    • Volume 20 Issue 01
    • JSPG Volume 19 Issue 01 (10 Years of Publishing)
    • Special Issue: 2021 NSPN-JSPG Policy Memo Competition
    • Special Issue: Shaping the Future of Science Policy
    • JSPG-UK SIN Special Issue: Climate Change Solutions
    • Volume 18 Issue 01
    • Special Issue: 2020 NSPN-JSPG Policy Memo Competition
    • Volume 17 Issue 01 (Supported by AAAS STPF)
    • JSPG-UN MGCY Special Issue: Impacts of Emerging Technologies
    • Volume 16 Issue 01
    • Volume 15 (Supported by CSPC)
    • Special Issue: 2019 NSPN-JSPG Policy Memo Competition
    • Volume 14
    • Volume 13
    • Volume 12
    • Volume 11
    • Volume 10
    • Volume 9
    • Volume 8
    • Volume 7
    • Volume 6
    • JSPG-UCS Special Issue: Healthy Food Policy
    • Volume 5
    • Volume 4
    • Special Issue: Hot Topics 2013
    • Volume 3
    • Volume 2
    • Volume 1
  • Submit to JSPG
    • Submission deadlines and guidelines
  • Announcements
    • News
    • Blog
  • Events
    • JSPG and NSPN 2024 Summer Standard Issue Events
    • Leadership chat series
  • Training
    • Writing
    • Resources
  • Media Mentions
  • Policy in action
  • Podcast
  • fabricated