Journal of Science Policy & Governance | Volume 18, Issue 04 | September 27, 2021

Policy Memo Competition Third Place Winner (Tie)

Policy Memo: Addressing Racial Disparities in NIH Funding 

Keywords: National Institutes of Health; funding; systemic racism; equity; STEM workforce; diversity
Executive Summary: The United States (US) must strategically invest in diversifying its biomedical workforce to retain global leadership in biomedical research and to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in the US. The under-representation of minority groups in the biomedical sciences is influenced by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant funding process which relies heavily on peer review subject to bias. Despite recent initiatives to combat structural racism within the NIH, the NIH has done little to rectify racial disparities in funding allocation that have been known for over a decade. In this report, I evaluate current NIH proposals to reduce bias in peer review and present stronger policy options for reducing inequity in grant funding. I recommend that the NIH treat the race/ethnicity funding disparity as it did the early career investigator disparity and immediately relax paylines and simultaneously prioritize research topics that align with interests of under-represented investigators, while working to develop a modified lottery for grant funding as a long-term solution to the biases that can influence grant peer review. Policies to address disparities in grant funding will diversify the biomedical workforce and have a profound and long-term positive impact on providing equitable access to science careers, regardless of race.​

-Read the full article through download.-
Download PDF

References

  1. Adam, David. 2019. “Science Funders Gamble on Grant Lotteries.” Nature 575 (7784): 574–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03572-7.
  2. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2018. “Figure 15: Percentage of Full-Time US Medical School Faculty by Race/Ethnicity, 2018.” 2018. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/figure-15-percentage-full-time-us-medical-school-faculty-race/ethnicity-2018.
  3. Benish, Sarah. 2018. “Meeting STEM Workforce Demands by Diversifying STEM.” Journal of Science Policy & Governance 13 (1).
  4. Bianchini, Julie A. 2011. Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington, District of Columbia: National Academies Press.
  5. Byrnes, Noni. 2020. “Race & Peer Review.” NIH Center for Scientific Review. June 12, 2020. https://www.csr.nih.gov/reviewmatters/2020/06/12/race-peer-review/.
  6. Carnethon, Mercedes R., Kiarri N. Kershaw, and Namratha R. Kandula. 2020. “Disparities Research, Disparities Researchers, and Health Equity.” JAMA 323 (3): 211. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.19329.
  7. Chang, Edward H., Katherine L. Milkman, Dena M. Gromet, Robert W. Rebele, Cade Massey, Angela L. Duckworth, and Adam M. Grant. 2019. “The Mixed Effects of Online Diversity Training.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (16): 7778–83. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816076116.
  8. Cropsey, Karen L., Saba W. Masho, Rita Shiang, Veronica Sikka, Susan G. Kornstein, Carol L. Hampton, and the Committee on the Status of Women and Minorities, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Medical College of Virginia Campus. 2008. “Why Do Faculty Leave? Reasons for Attrition of Women and Minority Faculty from a Medical School: Four-Year Results.” Journal of Women’s Health 17 (7): 1111–18. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.0582.
  9. Crotty, Shane, Catherine Blish, Ken Cadwell, Hongbo Chi, Ananda Goldrath, Douglas Green, Susan M. Kaech, et al. 2020. “Reinvigorating NIH Grant Peer Review.” Immunity 52 (1): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2019.12.016.
  10. CSR (NIH Center for Scientific Review). 2020. “CSR Content Analysis: Forums on Racial Disparities in Peer Review and More." https://public.csr.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2020-09/CSR_July_2020_Racial_Disparities_in_Funding_comment_summary.pdf.
  11. Dzau, Victor J., and Harvey V. Fineberg. 2015. “Restore the US Lead in Biomedical Research.” JAMA 313 (2): 143. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.17660.
  12. Dzirasa, Kafui. 2020. “Revising the a Priori Hypothesis: Systemic Racism Has Penetrated Scientific Funding.” Cell 183 (3): 576–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.026.
  13. Fairle, Robert W., Florian Hoffmann, and Philip Oreopoulos. 2014. “A Community College Instructor like Me: Race and Ethnicity Interactions in the Classroom.” American Economic Review 104 (8): 2567–91.
  14. Fang, Ferric C., Anthony Bowen, and Arturo Casadevall. 2016. “NIH Peer Review Percentile Scores Are Poorly Predictive of Grant Productivity.” ELife 5 (February): e13323. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13323.
  15. Fang, Ferric C., and Arturo Casadevall. 2009. “NIH Peer Review Reform—Change We Need, or Lipstick on a Pig?” Infection and Immunity 77 (3): 929–32. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01567-08.
  16. Fang, Ferric C., and Arturo Casadevall. 2016. “Research Funding: The Case for a Modified Lottery.” MBio 7 (2): e00422-16, /mbio/7/2/e00422-16.atom. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00422-16.
  17. Finkelstein, Martin J., Valerie Martin Conley, and Jack H. Schuster. 2016. “Taking the Measure of Faculty Diversity.” TIAA Institute. https://www.tiaainstitute.org/sites/default/files/presentations/2017-02/taking_the_measure_of_faculty_diversity.pdf.
  18. Gibbs, Kenneth D., Jacob Basson, Imam M. Xierali, and David A. Broniatowski. 2016. “Decoupling of the Minority PhD Talent Pool and Assistant Professor Hiring in Medical School Basic Science Departments in the US.” ELife 5 (November): e21393. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21393.
  19. Ginther, Donna K., Shulamit Kahn, and Walter T. Schaffer. 2016. “Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and National Institutes of Health R01 Research Awards: Is There Evidence of a Double Bind for Women of Color?” Academic Medicine 91 (8): 1098–1107. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001278.
  20. Ginther, Donna K., Walter T. Schaffer, Joshua Schnell, Beth Masimore, Faye Liu, Laurel L. Haak, and Raynard Kington. 2011. “Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 333 (6045): 1015–19. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196783.
  21. Graves, N., A. G. Barnett, and P. Clarke. 2011. “Funding Grant Proposals for Scientific Research: Retrospective Analysis of Scores by Members of Grant Review Panel.” BMJ 343 (sep27 1): d4797–d4797. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4797.
  22. Hayden, Erika C. 2015. “Racial Bias Continues to Haunt NIH Grants.” Nature 527 (7578): 286–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/527286a.
  23. Hoppe, Travis A., Aviva Litovitz, Kristine A. Willis, Rebecca A. Meseroll, Matthew J. Perkins, B. Ian Hutchins, Alison F. Davis, et al. 2019. “Topic Choice Contributes to the Lower Rate of NIH Awards to African-American/Black Scientists.” Science Advances 5 (10): eaaw7238. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw7238.
  24. Kaste, Martine. 2020. “NYPD Study: Implicit Bias Training Changes Minds, Not Necessarily Behavior. NPR.” National Public Radio. 2020. https://www.npr.org/2020/09/10/909380525/nypd-study-implicit-bias-training-changes-minds-not-necessarily-behavior.
  25. Lauer, Michael, Jamie Doyle, Joy Wang, and Deepshikha Roychowdhury. 2020. “National Institutes of Health Institute and Center Award Rates and Funding Disparities.” Preprint. Scientific Communication and Education. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.27.424490.
  26. Lee, Carole J., Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Guo Zhang, and Blaise Cronin. 2013. “Bias in Peer Review.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (1): 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22784.
  27. Ley, T. J., and B. H. Hamilton. 2008. “SOCIOLOGY: The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications.” Science 322 (5907): 1472–74. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165878.
  28. Liu, Mengyao, Vernon Choy, Philip Clarke, Adrian Barnett, Tony Blakely, and Lucy Pomeroy. 2020. “The Acceptability of Using a Lottery to Allocate Research Funding: A Survey of Applicants.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 5 (1): 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0089-z.
  29. McGee, Richard, Suman Saran, and Terry A. Krulwich. 2012. “Diversity in the Biomedical Research Workforce: Developing Talent.” The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, New York 79 (3): 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/msj.21310.
  30. Merton, R. K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The Reward and Communication Systems of Science Are Considered.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
  31. Moses, Hamilton, David H. M. Matheson, Sarah Cairns-Smith, Benjamin P. George, Chase Palisch, and E. Ray Dorsey. 2015. “The Anatomy of Medical Research: US and International Comparisons.” JAMA 313 (2): 174. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.15939.
  32. National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education. 2020. “Table 315.20. Full-Time Faculty in Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions, by Race/Ethnicity, Sex, and Academic Rank: Fall 2015, Fall 2017, and Fall 2018.” Accessed May 1, 2021. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=61.
  33. NIH. 2017. “A History of New and Early Stage Investigator Policies and Data.” August 29, 2017. https://grants.nih.gov/policy/early-investigators/history.htm.
  34. NIH. 2019a. “NIH Research Project Grant Program (R01).” NIH Central Resource for Grants and Funding Information. February 27, 2019. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/r01.htm.
  35. NIH. 2019b. “NIH Awards by Location & Organization.” NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT). December 12, 2019. https://report.nih.gov/award/index.cfm?ot=&fy=2020&state=USS,AL,AK,AZ,AR,CA,CO,CT,DE,DC,FL,GA,HI,ID,IL,IN,IA,KS,KY,LA,ME,MD,MA,MI,MN,MS,MO,MT,NE,NV,NH,NJ,NM,NY,NC,ND,OH,OK,OR,PA,RI,SC,SD,TN,TX,UT,VT,VA,WA,WV,WI,WY&ic=&fm=&orgid=&distr=&rfa=&om=n&pid=&view=statedetail.
  36. NIH. 2019c. “Research Topic Contributes to Persistent Gap in NIH Research Grants to Black Scientists.” News Releases. NIH Office of the Director (OD). October 9, 2019. https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/research-topic-contributes-persistent-gap-nih-research-grants-Black-scientists.
  37. NIH. 2021a. “Racial Disparities in NIH Funding.” NIH Office of the Director (OD), Scientific Workforce Diversity. Accessed April 15, 2021. https://diversity.nih.gov/building-evidence/racial-disparities-nih-funding.
  38. NIH. 2021b. “Glossary & Acronym List.” NIH Central Resource for Grants and Funding Information. Accessed April 30, 2021. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/glossary.htm.
  39. Pagano, Michele. 2006. “American Idol and NIH Grant Review.” Cell 126 (4): 637–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.004.
  40. Paluck, Elizabeth Levy, and Donald P. Green. 2009. “Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice.” Annual Review of Psychology 60 (1): 339–67. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607.
  41. Pier, Elizabeth L., Markus Brauer, Amarette Filut, Anna Kaatz, Joshua Raclaw, Mitchell J. Nathan, Cecilia E. Ford, and Molly Carnes. 2018. “Low Agreement among Reviewers Evaluating the Same NIH Grant Applications.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (12): 2952–57. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714379115.
  42. Pohlhaus, Jennifer Reineke, Hong Jiang, Robin M. Wagner, Walter T. Schaffer, and Vivian W. Pinn. 2011. “Sex Differences in Application, Success, and Funding Rates for NIH Extramural Programs:” Academic Medicine 86 (6): 759–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31821836ff.
  43. Ransdell, Lynda, Taylor Lane, Anna Schwartz, Heidi Wayment, and Julie Baldwin. 2021. “Mentoring New and Early-Stage Investigators and Underrepresented Minority Faculty for Research Success in Health-Related Fields: An Integrative Literature Review (2010–2020).” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (2): 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020432.
  44. Rockey, Sally. 2013. “Revisiting the Relationship Between Paylines and Success Rates.” National Institutes of Health Office of Extramural Research Extramural NEXUS. January 11, 2013. https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2013/01/11/revisiting-the-relationship-between-paylines-and-success-rates/.
  45. Sekar, Havya. 2020. “National Institutes of Health (NIH) Funding: FY1995-FY2021.” Congressional Research Service. www.crs.gov.
  46. Taffe, Michael A. 2020. “‘Merit’ and the NIH Disparity of Grant Award to Black PIs.” Drugmonkey (blog). June 10, 2020. https://drugmonkey.scientopia.org/2020/06/10/merit-and-the-nih-disparity-of-grant-award-to-Black-pis/.
  47. Taffe, Michael A., and Nicholas W. Gilpin. 2021. “Racial Inequity in Grant Funding from the US National Institutes of Health.” ELife 10 (January). https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65697.
  48. Taffe, Michael A., and Nicholas W. Gilpin. 2020. “Racial Inequity in Federal Grant Funding.” Preprint. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ucb62.
  49. The White House. 2021. FACT SHEET: The American Jobs Plan. March 31, 2021. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/31/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan/.
  50. Thomas, David A., and Robin J. Ely. 1996. “Making Differences Matter: A New Paradigm for Managing Diversity.” Harvard Business Review, no. 75: 79–90.
  51. Tillman, Linda C. 2001. “Mentoring African American Faculty in Predominantly White Institutions.” Research in Higher Education 42 (3): 295–325. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018822006485.
  52. Tollefson, Jeff, Amy Maxmen, Ariana Remmel, Nidhi Subbaraman, and Alexandra Witze. 2021. “Biden Pursues Giant Boost for Science Spending.” Nature 592 (7855): 498–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00897-0.
  53. United States (US) Census Bureau. 2019. “Table DP05. ACS Demographics and Housing Estimates.” 2019 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates. 2019. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/profile?q=United%20States&g=0100000US.
  54. Walsh, Rachael, Robert F. Moore, and Jamie Mihoko Doyle. 2018. “An Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health Early Stage Investigator Policy: Using Existing Data to Evaluate Federal Policy.” Research Evaluation 27 (4): 380–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy012.
  55. Wessely, Simon. 1998. “Peer Review of Grant Applications: What Do We Know?” The Lancet 352 (9124): 301–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11129-1.
  56. Woolston, Chris. 2020. “Fewer US Researchers Are Disclosing Disabilities on NIH Grant Applications.” Nature, March, d41586-020-00887–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00887-8.
Nicole Comfort is a 5th year doctoral student in the Environmental Health Sciences Department at Columbia University studying extracellular vesicle microRNA as biomarkers of environmental exposures and disease. She holds a BS in Behavioral Neuroscience from Northeastern University. Nicole has an active interest in science advocacy and policy, and is committed to advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion in the sciences.
 
Acknowledgements
NC is supported by the National Institutes of Health Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award Individual Predoctoral Fellowship (F31ES030973).
 
Disclaimer
Author’s views do not necessarily reflect those of her department or sponsors
DISCLAIMER: The findings and conclusions published herein are solely attributed to the author and not necessarily endorsed or adopted by the Journal of Science Policy and Governance. Articles are distributed in compliance with copyright and trademark agreements.

ISSN 2372-2193
© 2022 Journal of Science Policy & Governance, Inc. All rights reserved. The opinions, findings and conclusions from JSPG publications, additional article commentaries and related events do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal.