Journal of Science Policy & Governance
​Volume 19, Issue 01 | November 01, 2021

White Paper: The Development of Science and Technology Councils for Members of Congress

Lisbet T. Finseth (1,3), Lindsay K. Milliken (2), Tricia White (2), Michael A. Fisher (2)
  1. University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Cell and Developmental Biology, Aurora, CO
  2. The Federation of American Scientists, Washington, DC
  3. The ​​National Science Policy Network, San Francisco, CA

Corresponding authors: Lisbet.Finseth@CUAnschutz.edu and mfisher@fas.org
Keywords: Congress; science council; science and technology; science policy; technical assistance; science and technology policy; S&T policy​

Executive Summary

​Policy decisions should be informed by science, but legislators and their teams have limited capacity to connect with evidence-based resources and the expert community. By strengthening ties between science and policy, these two domains can be more readily integrated when making policy decisions. We established a process for building science and technology councils for Members of Congress, which function as a platform for scientists and legislators to engage. Legislators were selected by gauging the potential for objective, nonpartisan information from scientists to inform their work, as well as their offices’ prioritization of science policy issues. Experts with deep knowledge of these scientific issues were vetted, recruited, and appointed to the councils, and Members of Congress were connected to their designated councils. This bridging of science and policy demonstrates a platform that scientists can utilize to communicate objective, policy-relevant research and analysis as a trusted source of information, leading to more scientifically informed policy decision-making. 

-Read the full article through download.-

Background header image made by Saheel Mehta via Canva
​Lisbet Finseth recently earned her Master of Science in Biomedical Sciences and Biotechnology from the University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus. In addition, she studies oligodendrocytes and myelination in the Macklin lab. She was the President of the science communication and policy group, Project Bridge Colorado. Lisbet was also co-chair for the Western Hub of the National Science Policy Network, and a SciPol Scholar-in-Residence, collaborating with the Federation of American Scientists. She received her BA from Luther College.
 
Lindsay Milliken is a Policy Analyst for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy at the Federation of American Scientists. She supports both the Congressional Science Policy Initiative and the Technology and Innovation Initiative. Previously, she worked as a Legislative Research Assistant at Lewis-Burke Associates, a government relations firm specializing in science policy and higher education. Lindsay received her BA in Political Science with a minor in Physics from American University in Washington, DC.
 
Tricia White is an Intern with the Federation of American Scientists. She supports both the Congressional Science Policy Initiative and the Biological Weapons Convention Project. Tricia obtained her BA in International Affairs from the University of Georgia and is a MA candidate in Nonproliferation and Terrorism Studies at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies.
 
Michael A. Fisher, PhD, is a senior fellow with the Federation of American Scientists, working on a range of issues across the science and technology policy landscape. He leads the Congressional Science Policy Initiative, writes for the FAS Science Policy Blog and other outlets, contributes to the Day One Project, and serves on the SciTech Forefront Advisory Board. He also served as a field director with a congressional campaign and has experience with informal STEM education and the development of public-private partnerships. Dr. Fisher earned his B.S. in Biology from The College of New Jersey and his Ph.D. in Molecular Biology from Princeton University.
 
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. LTF received funding from the National Science Policy Network.

References

  1. Akerlof, K. 2018. Congress’s use of science: Considerations for science organizations in promoting the use of evidence in policy. American Association for the Advancement of Science (Washington, DC).
  2. Belei, B., Toni Bush, Maeve Campbell, Ash Carter, Lucy Chase, Mignon Clyburn, Bennett Craig, Daniel Gastfriend, Dipayan Ghosh, Gene Kimmelman, Heidi Legg, Laura Manley, Nicco Mele, Hong Qu, Amy Robbinson, Phillip Verveer, and Tom Wheeler. 2019. Big Tech and Democracy: The critical role of congress. Belfer center for science and international affairs, Harvard Kennedy School.
  3. Bradshaw, G. A. and Jeffrey G. Borchers. 2000. "Uncertainty as information: Narrowing the science-policy gap." Conservation Ecology 4, no. 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00174-040107
  4. Brooks, H. 1964. "The scientific advisor." In Scientists and national policy-making, 73-96. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  5. Cash, D. W., William C. Clark, Frank Alcock, Nancy M. Dickson, Noelle Eckley, David H. Guston, Jill Jager, and Ronald B. Mitchell. 2003. "Knowledge systems for sustainable development." Proceedings of the National Academy of the United States of America 100 (14): 8086-91. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100
  6. Consolidated Appropriations Act. 110-161. 110, Dec. 26, 2007.
  7. Corey, L., John R. Mascola, Anthony S. Fauci, and Francis S. Collins. 2020. "A strategic approach to COVID-19 vaccine R&D." Science 368 (6494): 948-950. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc5312
  8. Craft, Jonathan and Michael Howlett. 2012. "Policy formulation, governance shifts and policy influence: location and content in policy advisory systems." Journal of Public Policy 32 (2): 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x12000049.
  9. Craft, Jonathan and Michael Howlett. 2017. "The dual dynamics of policy advisory systems: The impact of externalization and politicization on policy advice." Policy and Society 32 (3): 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.001.
  10. Dodson, E. A., Katherine A. Stamatakis, Stephanie Chalifour, Debra Haire-Joshu, Timothy McBride, and Ross Brownson. 2013. "State legislators' work on public health-related issues: what influences priorities?" Journal of Public Health Management & Practice 19 (1): 25-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e318246475c. 
  11. Fox, Harrison W. Jr. and Susan Webb Hammond. 1977. "Congressional Staffs: The Invisible Force in American Lawmaking." New York: The Free Press 439, no. 227 (1): 174-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271627843900139.
  12. Görg, Christoph, Heidi Wittmer, Caitriona Carter, Esther Turnhout, Marie Vandewalle, Stefan Schindler, Barbara Livorell and Alexandra Lux. 2016. "Governance options for science–policy interfaces on biodiversity and ecosystem services: comparing a network versus a platform approach." Biodiversity and Conservation 25 (7): 1235-1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1132-8.
  13. Guston, D. H. 2001. "Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction." Science Technology & Human Values 26 (4): 399-408.
  14. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600401
  15. Legislative Reorganization Act. 91-510. Oct. 26.
  16. Lewallen, Jonathan, Sean M. Theriault and Bryan D. Jones. 2016. "Congressional dysfunction: An information processing perspective." Regulation & Governance 10 (2): 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12090.
  17. Lewandowsky, Stephan, Ullrich K. H. Ecker and John Cook. 2017. "Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era." Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6 (4): 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008.
  18. Madhavan, S., Lisa Bastarache, Jeffrey S. Brown, Atul J. Butte, David A. Dorr, Peter J. Embi, Charles P. Friedman, Kevin B. Johnson, Jason H. Moore, Isaac S. Kohane, et al. 2021. "Use of electronic health records to support a public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: a perspective from 15 academic medical centers." Journal of the American Medical Informatics ASsociation 28 (2): 393-401. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa287. 
  19. Membership of the 116th Congress: A Profile. 2020. edited by Congressional Research Service.
  20. Miesen, M., Laura Manley, Maeve Cambell, Chris Kuang and Emily Roseman. 2019. Building a 21st Century Congress: Improving Congress’s Science and Technology Expertise. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. 
  21. https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/building-21st-century-congress-improving-congresss-science-and-technology-expertise#toc-7-0-0
  22. Nelson, D., and S. W. Yackee. 2012. "Lobbying Coalitions and Government Policy Change: An Analysis of Federal Agency Rulemaking." Journal of Politics 74 (2): 339-353. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611001599. 
  23. Nuclear Energy Agency, Disposal of radioactive waste: forming of a new approach in Germany: summary and international perspective, in: FSC Workshop Proceedings, Hitzacker and Hamburg, Germany. 2006. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  24. OECD. 2007. "Political advisers and civil servants in European countries." Sigma Papers 38. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kml60qnxrkc-en.
  25. Pontius, John S. and Faye M Bullock. 2003. Congressional Staff: Duties and Functions. Congressional Research Service. http://www.llsdc.org/attachments/wysiwyg/544/CRS-98-340.pdf.
  26. Report of Committee Activities. 2002.
  27. Sarewitz, Daniel and Roger A. Pielke. 2007. "The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science." Environmental Science & Policy 10 (1): 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.001.
  28. Science and Technology Policy Assessment: A Congressionally Directed Review. 2019. edited by National Academy of Public Administration Congressional Research Service.
  29. Science, House Committee on. 24 September 1998. Unlocking Our Future Toward a New National Science Policy: A Report to Congress. http://www.house.gov/science/science_policy_report.htm.
  30. Siedner, Mark J., Guy Harling, Zahra Reynolds, Rebecca F. Gilbert, Sebastien Haneuse, Atheendar S. Venkataramani and Alexander C. Tsai. 2020. "Social distancing to slow the US COVID-19 epidemic: Longitudinal pretest-posttest comparison group study." PLoS Med 17 (8): e1003244. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003244. 
  31. Singh, Gerald G., Vinicius F. Farjalla, Bing Chen, Andrew E. Pelling Elvan Ceyhan, Martin Dominik, Eva Alisic, Jeremy Kerr, Noelle E. 
  32. Selin, Ghada Bassioni, et al. 2019. "Researcher engagement in policy deemed societally beneficial yet unrewarded." Front Ecol Environ 17 (7): 375-382. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2084. Singh, Gerald G., Jordan Tam, Thomas D. Sisk, Sarah C. Klain, Megan E. Mach, Rebecca G. Martone and Kai M. A. Chan. 2014. "A more social science: barriers and incentives for scientists engaging in policy." Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 12 (3): 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1890/130011.
  33. Survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers. 2006. Royal Society (London, UK: Royal Society). https://royalsociety.org/-/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2006/1111111395.pdf.
  34. The Technology Assessment Act. 92-484. Oct. 13.
  35. Van Den Hove, Sybille. 2007. "A rationale for science–policy interfaces." Futures 39 (7): 807-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.004.
  36. Warner, Justin. and Grant Tudor. 2019. The Congressional Futures Office: A Modern Model for Science & Technology Expertise in Congress. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/PAE/CongressionalFuturesOffice.pdf.
  37. White, Kasey Shewey and Joanne P. Carney. 2011. Working with Congress: A Scientist’s Guide to Policy. The American Association for the Advancement of Science.
DISCLAIMER: The findings and conclusions published herein are solely attributed to the author and not necessarily endorsed or adopted by the Journal of Science Policy and Governance. Articles are distributed in compliance with copyright and trademark agreements.

ISSN 2372-2193
© 2022 Journal of Science Policy & Governance, Inc. All rights reserved. The opinions, findings and conclusions from JSPG publications, additional article commentaries and related events do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal.