Journal of Science Policy & Governance
Volume 20, Issue 03 | August 22, 2022

Paper Competition Second Place Winner
Policy Memo: Advance U.S. International Diplomacy Efforts by Expanding Eligibility in the Embassy Science Fellows Program

Rami Major (1), JP Flores (2), Rachel Cherney (1) 
  1. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Chapel Hill,  NC, USA
  2. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Chapel Hill,  NC, USA
​
​Corresponding author: [email protected]​
Keywords: Congress; science diplomacy; science policy; foreign policy; collaboration; international diplomacy
https://doi.org/10.38126/JSPG200303

Executive Summary

Science has a unique ability to transcend borders in pursuit of common knowledge for the betterment of humanity. To increase technological and innovative progress, international collaboration is necessary and can be leveraged to advance foreign policy relationships. The United States (U.S.) Department of State’s (DoS) Embassy Science Fellows Program (ESFP) has a proven track record of advancing international diplomacy interests of the U.S. through scientific collaboration, yet the program is sorely underutilized despite the high demand for qualified science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) experts by embassies around the world. To address the demand for STEM experts willing to serve DoS interests, we propose broadening ESFP eligibility to non-federal scientists. With this change, the DoS can recruit from a larger pool of experts and increase the probability that embassy needs for science diplomats can be met, augmenting the impact of the ESFP on U.S. diplomacy initiatives.

-Read the full article through download.-

Background header image courtesy of  George C. Marshall Europe
Rami Major is a third-year Ph.D. candidate in the Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Her research interests lie in the use of gene editing to treat disease from both a technical and ethical perspective. Beyond the bench, she is involved in many science policy, communication, and outreach initiatives, including as Treasurer for the Science Policy and Advocacy Group (SPAG) at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

​JP Flores (he/him) is a first-year Ph.D. student in the Bioinformatics & Computational Biology curriculum at UNC Chapel Hill. He is in the lab of Doug Phanstiel studying how 3D chromatin structure affects gene regulation and transcription, cellular identity, and disease phenotypes. Specifically, he is interested in studying phase separation-driven chromatin looping. Outside of science, he is passionate about improving diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEM and believes an important part of that lies in science policy.

Rachel Cherney is a fifth-year Ph.D. candidate in the Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Her research aims to understand how RNA regulates gene expression. Outside of lab, Rachel is involved in science and media communication initiatives and loves to travel.

Acknowledgements 
The authors would like to acknowledge the diligent efforts of Dr. McLaughlin and colleagues to develop a publicly available review on a longstanding government program. Their research was crucial to understanding how the ESFP has historically worked. The authors would also like to thank their editors, Tara Shankar and Rebecca Van Hoeck, for their helpful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of the manuscript.

References

  1. American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 2020. America and the International Future of Science. Cambridge, Mass.: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. “Alumni of S&T Policy Fellowships.” n.d. Accessed April 4, 2022. https://www.aaas.org/programs/science-technology-policy-fellowships/alumni.
  3. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs. “Organizational Funding.” n.d. Accessed April 4, 2022. https://eca.state.gov/organizational-funding.
  4. CERN. 2022. “What We Do.” About. Accessed June 13 2022. https://home.cern/about/what-we-do. 
  5. Congressional Budget Office. “Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate: H.R. 1156 International Science and Technology Cooperation Act of 2015.” March 12, 2015.  https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/114th-congress-2015-2016/costestimate/hr115600.pdf. 
  6. Donahue, Michelle. 2022. “Short Terms, Long Gains: Embassy Science Fellows Build Bridges Abroad.” The American Association for the Advancement of Science, January 27, 2022. 
  7. Dutch Research Council (NWO). n.d. “Embassy Science Fellows.” Accessed July 18, 2022. https://www.nwo.nl/en/calls/embassy-science-fellows. ​
  8. Feder, Toni. 2003. “Government Scientists Do Stints in Embassies.” Physics Today 56, no. 7 (July 2003): 29–30. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1603069.
  9. Global Science Program for Security, Competitiveness, and Diplomacy Act of 2010. H.R. 4801, 111th Cong. (2010).
  10. Global Science Program for Security, Competitiveness, and Diplomacy Act of 2012, H.R. 6303, 112th Cong. (2012).
  11. International Science and Technology Cooperation Act of 2012, H.R. 5916, 112th Cong. (2012).
  12. International Science and Technology Cooperation Act of 2015. H.R. 1156, 114th Cong. (2015).
  13. Maughan, Heather. “US Science Diplomacy Bills Stuck in Congress.” Sci Dev Net. September 19, 2012. https://www.scidev.net/global/news/us-science-diplomacy-bills-stuck-in-congress/. 
  14. McLaughlin, Jacqueline, Gad Perry, Kevin Manuel, Kelly Soluri, and Andrew Hebbeler. 2021. “The U.S. Embassy Science Fellows Program: Implementation and Impacts,” 19.
  15. Mutual Education and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Pub.L. 87-256, 75 Stat. 527 (1961).
  16. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. “About Jefferson Fellows.” n.d. Accessed April 1, 2022. https://sites.nationalacademies.org/PGA/Jefferson/PGA_046613.
  17. National Science Foundation. 2016. “Report – Science & Engineering Indicators 2016.” Accessed April 1, 2022. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsb20161/#/report/chapter-3/s-e-workers-in-the-economy/employer-size.
  18. SESAME Synchrotron-light for Experimental Science and Applications in the Middle East. “What Is SESAME”. About Us. n.d. Accessed June 13, 2022. https://www.sesame.org.jo/about-us/what-is-sesame.
  19. U.S. Agency for International Development. 2022. “Science and Technology Fellowships.” Accessed March 17, 2022. https://www.usaid.gov/research/fellowships. 
  20. USAspending.gov. 2021. “Department of State (DOS)”. https://www.usaspending.gov/agency/department-of-state?fy=2021. 
  21. U.S. Department of State, Office of Science and Technology Cooperation. “U.S. Science Envoy Program.” n.d. Accessed April 4, 2022. https://www.state.gov/programs-office-of-science-and-technology-cooperation/u-s-science-envoy-program/#:~:text=Science%20Envoys%20meet%20government%20and,education%20and%20diversity%2C%20and%20energy. 
  22. U.S. Department of State, Office of Science and Technology Cooperation. “Embassy Science Fellows Program.” n.d. Accessed April 4, 2022. https://www.state.gov/programs-office-of-science-and-technology-cooperation/embassy-science-fellows-program/.
  23. The White House. 2009. “The President’s Speech In Cairo: A New Beginning.” The White House | President Barack Obama. June 2009. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/issues/foreign-policy/presidents-speech-cairo-a-new-beginning.
DISCLAIMER: The findings and conclusions published herein are solely attributed to the author and not necessarily endorsed or adopted by the Journal of Science Policy and Governance. Articles are distributed in compliance with copyright and trademark agreements.

ISSN 2372-2193
© 2022 Journal of Science Policy & Governance, Inc. All rights reserved. The opinions, findings and conclusions from JSPG publications, additional article commentaries and related events do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal.