Journal of Science Policy & Governance
​Volume 22, Issue 01 | March 6, 2023

Technology Assessment: International Opportunities and Technical Challenges for the Space Elevator

Christian Johnson
  1. RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA
​
Corresponding author: [email protected] ​
Keywords: space elevator; space policy ​
https://doi.org/10.38126/JSPG220107 ​

Executive Summary

The space elevator is a hypothetical concept for placing satellites in orbit around Earth that would result in dramatic cost savings over traditional rocket launches. The space elevator would work by placing a counterweight in space that is tethered to the Earth's surface and held in place by the centrifugal force of the Earth's rotation. Technical challenges, particularly those related to the tether material, have prevented a space elevator from getting past the design stage. Should future advances in materials science allow the space elevator to be built, consideration should be paid to the geopolitical influence that a real space elevator might have. Its unique combination of cost, wartime utility, and vulnerability mean that a peaceful consortium of nations working together should be considered as a potential management model.

-Read the full article through download.-

Background header image courtesy of Universe Today
Christian Johnson is an Associate Information Scientist with the RAND Corporation. His work focuses on the analysis and development of artificial intelligence, space technologies, and mathematical methods for public policy. He received his PhD in physics from the University of California, Santa Cruz, and his bachelor’s degree in physics from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 
​
Acknowledgements 
The author would like to thank Edward Parker, Scott Harold, Chad Ohlandt, Bonnie Triezenberg, and David Kipping for helpful comments and suggestions in the preparation of this paper.

References

  1. Aravind, P. K. 2007. “The Physics of the Space Elevator.” American Journal of Physics 75 (2): 125–30. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2404957. 
  2. Aslanov, Vladimir S., Alexander S. Ledkov, Arun K. Misra, and Anna D. Guerman. 2013. “Dynamics of Space Elevator After Tether Rupture.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 36 (4): 986–92. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.59378. 
  3. Barry, Kevin, and Eduardo Pineda Alfaro. 2022. “Changing the Economic Paradigm for Building a Space Elevator.” Acta Astronautica 200 (November): 586–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.08.025.
  4. Boen, Brooke. 2015. “Turning Down the Volume on Rocket Noise.” Text. NASA. April 15, 2015. http://www.nasa.gov/sls/smat-acoustic-testing.h tml. 
  5. Bogar, Thomas J. 2000. “Hypersonic Airplane Space Tether Orbital Launch System.” NIAC Research Grant 07600-018. Boeing. 
  6. David, Leonard. 2014. “Futuristic Moon Elevator Idea Takes Aim at Lunar Lifts.” Space.Com. March 4, 2014. https://www.space.com/24905-moon-elevator-l unar-exploration-liftport.html. 
  7. Edwards, Bradley C. 2000. “Design and Deployment of a Space Elevator.” Acta Astronautica 47 (10): 735–44. 
  8. ———. 2002. “Space Elevator: An Ideal Application for the Free-Electron Laser.” In Laser and Beam Control Technologies, 4632:134–40. SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.469764. 
  9. Edwards, Bradley C. 2003. “The Space Elevator NIAC Phase II Final Report.” Http://Keithcu.Com/Wiki/Images/6/67/Edward s_NIAC_Phase_II. Pdf. 
  10. Gibson, Tom. 2022. “Space Elevators Are Getting Closer to Reality.” Bloomberg, 2022. 
  11. Harris, Tyler M., Pragnya L. Eranki, and Amy E. Landis. 2019. “Life Cycle Assessment of Proposed Space Elevator Designs.” Acta Astronautica 161 (August): 465–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.02.028. 
  12. International Space Station Intergovernmental Agreement. 1998. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/201 9/02/12927-Multilateral-Space-Space-Station-1.29.1998.pdf. 
  13. Isachenkov, Vladimir, and Marcia Dunn. 2022. “Russia to Drop out of International Space Station after 2024.” AP NEWS. July 26, 2022. https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-puti​n-science-241e789005f6375eeac3189acbdbc140 . 
  14. Matsunaka, Yasuo. 2021. “The Race Is on in Japan to Build a Space Elevator Through Open Innovation.” December 14, 2021. https://redshift.autodesk.com/articles/japan-spa ce-elevator. 
  15. Mohanalingam, Madhukarthik, and Christopher Carr. 2023. “Interplanetary Rapid Transit Missions from Earth to Mars Using Directed Laser Energy Driven Light Sails.” arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.02327. 
  16. Pearson, Jerome. 1975. “The Orbital Tower: A Spacecraft Launcher Using the Earth’s Rotational Energy.” Acta Astronautica 2: 785–99. 
  17. Peet, Matthew M. 2021. “The Orbital Mechanics of Space Elevator Launch Systems.” Acta Astronautica 179 (February): 153–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.10.032. 
  18. Penoyre, Zephyr, and Emily Sandford. 2019. “The Spaceline: A Practical Space Elevator Alternative Achievable with Current Technology.” arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1908.09339. 
  19. Pettit, Don. 2012. “NASA - The Tyranny of the Rocket Equation.” Other. Brian Dunbar. May 1, 2012. https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/ex peditions/expedition30/tryanny.html. 
  20. Piesing, Mark. 2022. “The Pollution Caused by Rocket Launches.” July 15, 2022. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20220713- how-to-make-rocket-launches-less-polluting. 
  21. Popescu, Dan M, and Sean X. Sun. 2018. “Building the Space Elevator: Lessons from Biological Design.” Journal of the Royal Society Interface 15. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0086. 
  22. Price, Steve. 2000. “Audacious & Outrageous: Space Elevators.” NASA Science News, 2000. 
  23. Pugno, Nicola M. 2007. “Space Elevator: Out of Order?” Nano Today 2 (6): 44–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1748-0132(07)70173- 1. 
  24. ———. 2013. “Towards the Artsutanov’s Dream of the Space Elevator: The Ultimate Design of a 35GPa Strong Tether Thanks to Graphene.” Acta Astronautica, 7th IAA Symposium on Realistic Advanced Scientific Space MissionsAosta, Italy, July 2011, 82 (2): 221–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.01.008. 
  25. Reuters. 2020. “China Aims to Operate Regular Space Flights by 2045, Official Says,” September 18, 2020, sec. Science News. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-space -idUKKBN2691XL. 
  26. “STARS Project.” 2022. 2022. http://stars.eng.shizuoka.ac.jp/english.html. Swan, Peter, David Raitt, Cathy Swan, John Knapman, Skip Penny, and plus others. 2013. Space Elevators: An Assessment of Technological Feasibility and the Way Forward. 
  27. Zangari, Amanda M., Tiffany J. Finley, S. Alan Stern, and Mark B. Tapley. 2019. “Return to the Kuiper Belt: Launch Opportunities from 2025 to 2040.” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 56 (3): 919–30. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34329. 
  28. Zhang, Rufan, Yingying Zhang, Qiang Zhang, Huanhuan Xie, Weizhong Qian, and Fei Wei. 2013. “Growth of Half-Meter Long Carbon Nanotubes Based on Schulz–Flory Distribution.” ACS Nano 7 (7): 6156–61. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn401995z.

DISCLAIMER: The findings and conclusions published herein are solely attributed to the author and not necessarily endorsed or adopted by the Journal of Science Policy and Governance. Articles are distributed in compliance with copyright and trademark agreements.

ISSN 2372-2193
© 2022 Journal of Science Policy & Governance, Inc. All rights reserved. The opinions, findings and conclusions from JSPG publications, additional article commentaries and related events do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal.