Journal of Science Policy & Governance
​​Volume 20, Issue 02 | May 16, 2022

Policy Position Paper: Hardwired to learn science but left out of the landscape: the role of expanding access to quality science education in America for elementary learners

Christine Hirst-Bernhardt, Kama Almasi
Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship Program, Washington, DC​

Corresponding author: [email protected]
Keywords: elementary education; STEM education; science education; elementary education policy; teacher professional development; STEM workforce; STEM pipeline ​
https://doi.org/10.38126/JSPG200204 ​

Executive Summary

There has never been a greater need for a scientifically literate population, yet science education remains inaccessible for many learners. National STEM priorities continue to focus on older learners and adults while failing to expand access to elementary school students. In the past 30 years, science instructional minutes have decreased dramatically, likely the unintentional outcome of accountability metrics that overemphasize math and reading at the expense of other subjects. In some districts, students do not receive any science until middle grades. Elementary teachers may not receive any instruction in science and lack the confidence and resources to effectively weave content into their already overflowing plate. The National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine recently published two reports that identify widespread disparities in access to science education while also outlining growth opportunities. These reports address the causes and impacts of the disparities, and outline recommended solutions at all levels. Here we present our arguments for integrating high-quality science in elementary classrooms, drawing heavily on the reports for evidence and potential solutions. The pandemic and climate change have focused attention on the vital role of science in our lives; it’s time to invest in our youngest learners and natural-born scientists with opportunities to leverage their innate skills and prepare them as the leaders of tomorrow.

-Read the full article through download.-

Background header image courtesy of Flickr
Christine Hirst Bernhardt Christine Hirst Bernhardt is currently serving in the U.S. House of Representatives as an Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellow. She holds dual Master’s degrees in Space Studies and Science Education and is pursuing her Ph.D. in STEM Education. She has taught STEM and astronomy courses in middle, high school, college, and educator programs. Christine’s commitment to propelling the intersectional needs of STEM education and passion for bringing space content to the masses has resulted in the development of innovative student space experiment programs and large-scale curricular development projects.
​
Kama Almasi Dr. Kama Almasi is currently serving in the U.S. House of Representatives as an Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellow. She earned a Ph.D. in Ecology and initially taught at the university level. To better address the needs for diversity and equity in STEM fields, she pivoted to teach science and mathematics in grades 6-12. Kama has a long history as a liaison between scientists, community partners, and K-12 educators in Oregon and has experience building grant programs, writing grant proposals, and leading professional development experiences for teachers.

References

  1. 3M Science. 2021. “3M State of Science Index Survey: Explore the Data & Results”. Accessed January 22, 2022. https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/state-of-science-index-survey/interactive-3m-state-of-science-survey/
  2. Boser, Ulrich and Catherine Brown. 2015. “5 Key Principles to Guide Consideration of Any ESEA Title I Formula Change”. Center for American Progress, July 7, 2015. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/5-key-principles-to-guide-consideration-of-any-esea-title-i-formula-change/ 
  3. Boser, Ulrich, Matthew Chingos, and Chelsea Straus. 2015. “The Hidden Value of Curriculum Reform.” Center for American Progress, October 14, 2015. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-hidden-value-of-curriculum-reform/
  4. Buck Institute for Education (BIE). n.d. “What is Project-Based Learning?” Accessed March 1, 2022. https://www.pblworks.org/what-is-pbl 
  5. Bulunuz, Mizrap. 2015. “The role of playful science in developing positive attitudes toward teaching science in a science teacher preparation program.” Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 58: 67-88. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1112479.pdf 
  6. Center for Research & Policy in the Public Interest (CR2PI). 2010. “Income and Poverty in Communities of Color”. Accessed April 18, 2022. http://cr2pi-nywf.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Policy-Brief-Income-and-Poverty-in-Communities-of-Color-rev-1.pdf 
  7. Change the Equation. 2015. “Ending the Double Disadvantage: Ensuring STEM Opportunities in our Poorest Schools”. Washington, D.C. Accessed January 22, 2022. https://ecs.secure.force.com/studies/rstempg?id=a0r0g000009TLbE
  8. Cornman, Stephen, Lei Zhou, Malia Howell, Jeremy Phillips, and Jumaane Young. 2020. Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: FY 18. Washington D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2020306​
  9. Education Resource Strategies. 2018. “Addressing the Teacher Labor Market Challenge in Arizona: The case for strategic educational funding across the state.” Accessed March 1, 2022. https://www.erstrategies.org/tap/teacher_pay_in_Arizona
  10. Gerlach, Jonathan. 2018. “Is STEM Interest Fading with Students?” Everfi. Accessed January 22, 2022.  https://everfi.com/infographic/k-12/is-stem-interest-fading-with-students/
  11. Kazempour, Mahsa. 2014. “I Can't Teach Science! A Case Study of an Elementary Pre-Service Teacher's Intersection of Science Experiences, Beliefs, Attitude, and Self-Efficacy.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 9(1):77-96. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1016889.pdf 
  12. Kober, Nancy and Alexandra Usher. 2012. “A Public Education Primer: Basic (and Sometimes Surprising) Facts about the U.S. Educational System.” Center on Education Policy. Washington, D.C. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED528710
  13. Marco‐Bujosa, Lisa, Katherine McNeill, and Audrey Friedman. 2020. “Becoming an urban science teacher: How beginning teachers negotiate contradictory school contexts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57(1): 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21583
  14. Nadelson, Louis, Janet Callahan, Patricia Pyke, and Anne Hay. 2013. “Teacher STEM Perception and Preparation: Inquiry-Based STEM Professional Development for Elementary Teachers.” Journal of Education Research 106(2):157-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.667014
  15. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021a. Call to Action for Science Education: Building Opportunity for the Future. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26152
  16. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021b. Science and Engineering in Preschool Through Elementary Grades: The Brilliance of Children and the Strengths of Educators. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/download/26215 
  17. National Research Council (NRC). 2007. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/download/11625 
  18. National Research Council (NRC). 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165 
  19. National Science Teaching Association. 2018. “Position Statement: Elementary School Science.” Accessed January 18, 2022. https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/elementary-school-science 
  20. New Tech Network (NTN). 2021. “New Tech Network Impact Report.” Accessed March 9, 2022. https://newtechnetwork.org/2021-impact-report/
  21. NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC:National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/download/18290 
  22. Trygstad, Peggy, P. Sean Smith, Eric Banilower, and Michele Nelson. 2013. The Status of Elementary Science Education: Are We Ready for the Next Generation Science Standards? Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED548249.pdf 
  23. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 2013. World Social Science Report 2013: Changing Global Environments. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000224677 
  24. Young, Jemimah, Jamaal Young, and Noelle Paufler. 2017. “Out of School and into STEM: Supporting Girls of Color Through Culturally Relevant Enrichment.” Journal of Interdisciplinary Teacher Leadership 2(1):28-34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313145973_Out_of_School_and_into_STEM_Supporting_Girls_of_Color_through_Culturally_Relevant_Enrichment/link/58911c3f92851cda2568a498/download
DISCLAIMER: The findings and conclusions published herein are solely attributed to the author and not necessarily endorsed or adopted by the Journal of Science Policy and Governance. Articles are distributed in compliance with copyright and trademark agreements.

ISSN 2372-2193
© 2022 Journal of Science Policy & Governance, Inc. All rights reserved. The opinions, findings and conclusions from JSPG publications, additional article commentaries and related events do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal.